Teams

Chip N Charge

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-09-14vs Court CrusadersWon 20
W#1 SinglesDevin Stone vs Brian Gorman6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesZhiwei Lin vs Keitaro Nishimura2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-08-26vs High Noon BallersLost 12
L#1 SinglesWilliam Bates vs Johan Holmberg4-6, 2-3
W#2 SinglesDevin Stone vs Luis Esposito6-4, 1-2
L#3 SinglesZhiwei Lin vs Mark Sampson1-6, 1-6
2023-08-12vs Net AssetsLost 02
L#1 SinglesDrew Vollmer vs Matthew Christian2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesZhiwei Lin vs Frederic Colas1-6, 4-6
2023-08-06vs High Noon BallersLost 03
L#1 SinglesWilliam Bates vs Joshua Lobert1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew Mannarino vs Johan Holmberg3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMilin Iyer vs Justin Metz1-6, 0-6
2023-07-29vs Court CrusadersWon 30
W#1 SinglesAndrew Mannarino vs Benjamin Owsley6-1, 5-5
W#2 SinglesDrew Vollmer vs Eric Kruszewski7-5, 4-4
W#3 SinglesMilin Iyer vs Brian Gorman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-22vs Net AssetsLost 03
L#1 SinglesWilliam Bates vs Kenzell Crawford7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDevin Stone vs Jonathan Kim6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesZhiwei Lin vs Frederic Colas2-6, 1-6
2023-07-15vs High Noon BallersLost 02
L#1 SinglesMilin Iyer vs Brent Kendall2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesDrew Vollmer vs Johan Holmberg3-6, 1-6
2023-07-13vs Court CrusadersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMilin Iyer vs Benjamin Owsley0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesZhiwei Lin vs Brian Gorman6-4, 7-5
2023-07-08vs Net AssetsLost 12
L#1 SinglesDrew Vollmer vs JD Zachry1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDevin Stone vs Justin Dorsk4-6, 1-4
W#3 SinglesWilliam Bates vs Ian Burke6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
William Bates
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Andrew Mannarino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Devin Stone
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
Drew Vollmer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.60
Zhiwei Lin
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.59
Milin Iyer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.38
Shawn Drury
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.04
Brian Lynch
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

William Bates
28W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Andrew Mannarino
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Devin Stone
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Drew Vollmer
10W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Zhiwei Lin
10W–8L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Milin Iyer
99W–128L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Shawn Drury
42W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
3
Brian Lynch
64W–81L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.