Teams

Court Crusaders

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-09-14vs Chip N ChargeLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrian Gorman vs Devin Stone3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesEric Kruszewski vs Shawn Drury6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Zhiwei Lin6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-26vs Net AssetsWon 10
W#2 SinglesTucker Howard vs Justin Dorsk6-3, 3-4
2023-08-12vs High Noon BallersSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBrian Gorman vs Mark Sampson0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Justin Metz6-4, 6-2
2023-08-06vs Net AssetsLost 03
L#1 SinglesEric Kruszewski vs Matthew Christian0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Quentin Carter1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTucker Howard vs Ian Burke2-6, 4-3
2023-07-29vs Chip N ChargeLost 02
L#2 SinglesEric Kruszewski vs Drew Vollmer5-7, 4-4
L#3 SinglesBrian Gorman vs Milin Iyer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-23vs High Noon BallersLost 02
L#1 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Joshua Folk3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesEric Kruszewski vs Brent Kendall1-6, 1-6
2023-07-16Lost 01
L#2 SinglesEric Kruszewski vs Mark Sampson3-6, 3-6
2023-07-15vs Net AssetsLost 03
L#1 SinglesKeitaro Nishimura vs Thomas Cyrnak2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTucker Howard vs Quentin Carter2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesBrian Gorman vs Frederic Colas0-6, 3-6
2023-07-13vs Chip N ChargeLost 01
L#2 SinglesBrian Gorman vs Zhiwei Lin4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Court Crusaders1862140271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Tucker Howard
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Keitaro Nishimura
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 4
Chris Takiar
published 3.5
3.03
Brian Gorman
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Eric Kruszewski
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tucker Howard
172W–96L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Keitaro Nishimura
148W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Chris Takiar
14W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Brian Gorman
14W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Eric Kruszewski
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Taechatham Nantawisarakul
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.