Teams

High Noon Ballers

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.25 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-08-26vs Chip N ChargeWon 10
W#1 SinglesJohan Holmberg vs William Bates6-4, 3-2
2023-08-16vs Net AssetsLost 02
L#1 SinglesJoshua Folk vs Justin Dorsk1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJoshua Lobert vs Matthew Christian2-6, 6-4
2023-08-12vs Court CrusadersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJohan Holmberg vs Benjamin Owsley6-2, 7-6
L#3 SinglesJustin Metz vs Keitaro Nishimura4-6, 2-6
2023-08-06vs Chip N ChargeWon 30
W#1 SinglesJoshua Lobert vs William Bates6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJohan Holmberg vs Andrew Mannarino6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJustin Metz vs Milin Iyer6-1, 6-0
2023-07-23vs Net AssetsLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrent Kendall vs Thomas Cyrnak0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJoshua Folk vs Matthew Christian3-6, 5-5
2023-07-23vs Court CrusadersWon 20
W#1 SinglesJoshua Folk vs Keitaro Nishimura6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrent Kendall vs Eric Kruszewski6-1, 6-1
2023-07-16vs Court CrusadersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJoshua Lobert vs Benjamin Owsley6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJustin Metz vs Taechatham Nantawisarakul5-7, 1-2
2023-07-15vs Chip N ChargeWon 30
W#1 SinglesBrent Kendall vs Milin Iyer6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJohan Holmberg vs Drew Vollmer6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJoshua Folk vs Shawn Drury6-1, 4-4
2023-07-09vs Net AssetsWon 10
W#2 SinglesJoshua Lobert vs Justin Dorsk6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Joshua Lobert
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.15
Johan Holmberg
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Luis Esposito
published
3.94
Brent Kendall
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.81
Justin Metz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.76
Joshua Folk
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Johan Holmberg + Brent Kendall5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joshua Lobert
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Johan Holmberg
128W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
4.15
Luis Esposito
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Brent Kendall
184W–123L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
Justin Metz
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Joshua Folk
24W–25L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.