Teams

GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Cisneros#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Mirazo#5000000
2GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Davie#2000000
3GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Cisneros#1000000
4GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Duarte#3000000
5GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Friedl#4000000
6GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Moore#6000000
7GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Silverstein#7000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Jaime Ramos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Anthony Haddad
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Armando Landa
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.59
Hector Montalvo
usually #2 Doubles 28%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3.5
3.32
Efren Becerra
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Mauricio Cisneros
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Omar Abbud
usually #1 Doubles 32%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Raul Santillan
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Sebastian Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Victor Tapia
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Efren Becerra + Raul Santillan9357% gamesnot enough data
Omar Abbud + Mauricio Cisneros3452% gamesnot enough data
Omar Abbud + Sebastian Acosta5257% gamesnot enough data
Mauricio Cisneros + Sebastian Acosta5256% gamesnot enough data
Victor Tapia + Mauricio Cisneros134 matchesnot enough data
Victor Tapia + Sebastian Acosta303 matchesnot enough data
Omar Abbud + Armando Landa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jaime Ramos
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Anthony Haddad
57W–43L career · 15 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Armando Landa
41W–23L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.98
3.5
Hector Montalvo
29W–10L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
3.5
Efren Becerra
45W–21L career · 20 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Mauricio Cisneros
74W–71L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Omar Abbud
56W–26L career · 25 lines in 2026
not enough data
Raul Santillan
32W–17L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sebastian Acosta
23W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victor Tapia
16W–16L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.