Teams

GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Davie#2

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Mirazo#5000000
2GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Davie#2000000
3GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Cisneros#1000000
4GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Duarte#3000000
5GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Friedl#4000000
6GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Moore#6000000
7GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Silverstein#7000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Chris Missirian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
3.52
Alejandro Cervantes
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4
Don Davie
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Eddie Nassar
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Gustavo Ganem
published
Joshua Rhoads
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Juan Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Sebastian Martinez-Villalba
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tony Magana
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Missirian + Tony Magana3350% gamesnot enough data
Eddie Nassar + Juan Acevedo2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Missirian
46W–65L career · 8 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Alejandro Cervantes
23W–22L career · 11 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Don Davie
23W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Eddie Nassar
37W–60L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gustavo Ganem
16W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Joshua Rhoads
24W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Acevedo
50W–82L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sebastian Martinez-Villalba
8W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tony Magana
87W–41L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.