Teams

GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Moore#6

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 2026 TRI-LEVEL LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Mirazo#5000000
2GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Davie#2000000
3GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Cisneros#1000000
4GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Duarte#3000000
5GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Friedl#4000000
6GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Moore#6000000
7GEPTA/Tri-level/4.5-3.5M/Silverstein#7000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Andres Madrid
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4.5
3.90
Mike Caldarella
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Moore
published 4
3.20
Daniel Trejo
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
Fermin Escalante
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Jorge Chavez
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Julio Cesar CastaNEDA
usually #3 Doubles 28%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Luis Blasco
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Randy Gardea
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Ricardo Ortiz
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Wilfredo Fonseca
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andres Madrid + Julio Cesar CastaNEDA2644% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andres Madrid
25W–25L career · 16 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
4.34
Mike Caldarella
41W–40L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
John Moore
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Daniel Trejo
37W–39L career · 11 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Fermin Escalante
47W–32L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jorge Chavez
65W–38L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julio Cesar CastaNEDA
20W–28L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luis Blasco
32W–35L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Gardea
13W–12L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ricardo Ortiz
25W–67L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wilfredo Fonseca
47W–41L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.