Teams

RMTC GREEN

2022 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-14vs LPTC REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesBarb McEahern / Melanie Banders vs Rebecca BaanHofman / Kay Newman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-07vs HIW BRONZESplit 11
W#1 DoublesMelanie Banders / Barb McEahern vs KC OLeary / Jessica Curley6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHillary Rosner / Amy Scheff vs Amy Fletcher / Jayne McGarry4-6, 5-7
2022-08-31vs NJ ORANGEWon 20
W#1 SinglesMelanie Banders vs Maggie Gomer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Ernest / Barb McEahern vs Laura Freeman / Heather Roberts6-3, 6-3
2022-08-17vs NJ TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelanie Banders / Amy Scheff vs Shannon Hempelman / Deena Green2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBarb McEahern vs Ingrid Palmer1-6, 2-6
2022-08-10vs LPTC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarb McEahern / Amy Scheff vs Kay Newman / Rebecca BaanHofman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMelanie Banders vs Tina Atchley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesMelanie Banders / Lilli Rossman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Barb McEahern
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.85
Catherine Ruelas
published 3
2.75
Melanie Banders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.15
Hillary Rosner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.10
Amy Scheff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Brigid Hogan
published
Lilli Rossman
published
Mary Ernest
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Scheff + Mary Ernest3350% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barb McEahern
80W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Catherine Ruelas
67W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Melanie Banders
41W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
2.5
Hillary Rosner
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Amy Scheff
21W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Brigid Hogan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lilli Rossman
0W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Ernest
5W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.