Teams

HIW BRONZE

2022 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-14vs NJ ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRoisin Lakings / KC OLeary vs Kathleen Harvey / Nancy Santmyer3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Fletcher / Jayne McGarry vs Heather Roberts / Shirley Willard6-1, 6-0
2022-09-07vs RMTC GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKC OLeary / Jessica Curley vs Melanie Banders / Barb McEahern1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Fletcher / Jayne McGarry vs Hillary Rosner / Amy Scheff6-4, 7-5
2022-08-31vs NJ TEALLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Fletcher / Kristine Stump vs Deena Green / Cassandra Thompson6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRoisin Lakings / Jayne McGarry vs Susan Miller / Shannon Hempelman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-24vs LPTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSharlene Funk / Amy Fletcher vs Fabiana Kahn / Tina Atchley3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKC OLeary vs Ashwini Pillai6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Curley / Roisin Lakings vs Kay Newman / Jillian Clark6-2, 6-3
2022-08-10vs NJ ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristine Stump / Jayne McGarry vs Nancy Santmyer / Holly McClure3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmy Fletcher / KC OLeary vs Heather Roberts / Shirley Willard6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PTC NAVY6117416146
2HIW BRONZE1561226182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.37
Amy Fletcher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.36
Sharlene Funk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.27
Jayne McGarry
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
KC OLeary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kristine Stump
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roisin Lakings
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharlene Funk + Amy Fletcher3251% games+4.2% vs expected
Amy Fletcher + Jayne McGarry6354% games+2.7% vs expected
Roisin Lakings + Amy Fletcher224 matchesnot enough data
Roisin Lakings + Jayne McGarry224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Fletcher + KC OLeary134 matchesnot enough data
Sharlene Funk + Kristine Stump213 matchesnot enough data
Roisin Lakings + Kristine Stump123 matchesnot enough data
Kristine Stump + Jayne McGarry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Amy Fletcher
33W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%85%15%
2.37
3
Sharlene Funk
69W–70L career · type A · 1 line in 2022
85%15%<1%
2.36
Jayne McGarry
31W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
KC OLeary
5W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristine Stump
8W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Roisin Lakings
11W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.