Teams

LPTC RED

2022 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-14vs RMTC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca BaanHofman / Kay Newman vs Barb McEahern / Melanie Banders6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-09-08vs NJ TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesTina Atchley / Rebecca BaanHofman vs Deena Green / Mary Elizabeth Frederick6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesFabiana Kahn / Kay Newman vs Shannon Hempelman / Cassandra Thompson5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-24vs HIW BRONZELost 03
L#1 DoublesFabiana Kahn / Tina Atchley vs Sharlene Funk / Amy Fletcher6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAshwini Pillai vs KC OLeary2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKay Newman / Jillian Clark vs Jessica Curley / Roisin Lakings2-6, 3-6
2022-08-17vs NJ ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesTina Atchley / Rebecca BaanHofman vs Kathleen Harvey / Betty Evans6-4, 6-2
2022-08-10vs RMTC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesKay Newman / Rebecca BaanHofman vs Barb McEahern / Amy Scheff4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTina Atchley vs Melanie Banders4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-03vs NJ TEALSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTina Atchley / Rebecca BaanHofman vs Susan Miller / Ingrid Palmer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJillian Clark / Kay Newman vs Shannon Hempelman / Cassandra Thompson6-3, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Tina Atchley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.86
Rebecca BaanHofman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Kay Newman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.33
Jillian Clark
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ashwini Pillai
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Fabiana Kahn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Atchley + Rebecca BaanHofman593157% games+5.9% vs expected
Kay Newman + Rebecca BaanHofman4162% gamesnot enough data
Kay Newman + Jillian Clark134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tina Atchley
148W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Rebecca BaanHofman
94W–76L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
2.5
Kay Newman
73W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
Jillian Clark
46W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Ashwini Pillai
15W–25L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Fabiana Kahn
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.