Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Dominguez/EPTC#8

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 2.86 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Delgado/Adult 18 & over/3.0W11152822304
2GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Baeza/EPCC#1111441639356
3GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Martinez/EPTC#3102421842423
4GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Bordier/EPTC#6102411946444
5GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Wilcox/TW#284322863528
6GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Alarcon/TW#175322862488
7GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#275322866517
8GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Rangel/EPTC#575303069516
9GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Da Costa/EPTC#248273373550
10GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Payan/EPTC#748253575560
11GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Boss/EPTC#948174394618
12GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#139223879574
13GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Dominguez/EPTC#839213982590
14GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Shepherd/FB111144697646
15GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC012184288589

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.74
Alejandra Beltran
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Isabella Arias
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.63
Christina Dominguez
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.57
Cassidy Cybriwsky
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.50
Destiny Blanchette
usually #2 Singles 35%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3
2.28
Hossana Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 2.5
2.23
Christine Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
Jessica Trachter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Karina Zuniga
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 26% · published
Kristine Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published
Megan Walia
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
Naomi Ramirez Aizawa
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #2 Singles 23% · published
Paola Rojas Miranda
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Perla Carrillo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stacey Schaber
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Victoria Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Dominguez + Stacey Schaber15951% gamesnot enough data
Perla Carrillo + Destiny Blanchette3346% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Dominguez + Alejandra Beltran3254% gamesnot enough data
Perla Carrillo + Karina Zuniga224 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Dominguez + Christine Gomez224 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Trachter + Megan Walia033 matchesnot enough data
Destiny Blanchette + Christine Gomez033 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Dominguez + Christina Dominguez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alejandra Beltran
14W–7L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Isabella Arias
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Christina Dominguez
12W–13L career · 16 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Cassidy Cybriwsky
7W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57
3
Destiny Blanchette
16W–26L career · 16 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.50
2.5
Hossana Gallegos
18W–27L career · 20 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Christine Gomez
20W–30L career · 26 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Jessica Trachter
14W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Karina Zuniga
35W–22L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristine Garcia
23W–25L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Walia
6W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Naomi Ramirez Aizawa
7W–6L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paola Rojas Miranda
16W–28L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Perla Carrillo
15W–24L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Schaber
25W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Dominguez
34W–31L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.