Teams

GEPTA/Delgado/Adult 18 & over/3.0W

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 2.94 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Delgado/Adult 18 & over/3.0W11152822304
2GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Baeza/EPCC#1111441639356
3GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Martinez/EPTC#3102421842423
4GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Bordier/EPTC#6102411946444
5GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Wilcox/TW#284322863528
6GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Alarcon/TW#175322862488
7GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#275322866517
8GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Rangel/EPTC#575303069516
9GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Da Costa/EPTC#248273373550
10GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Payan/EPTC#748253575560
11GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Boss/EPTC#948174394618
12GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#139223879574
13GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Dominguez/EPTC#839213982590
14GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Shepherd/FB111144697646
15GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC012184288589

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Daniela Baylon
usually #2 Doubles 26%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3
3.09
Camila Olmos
usually #1 Singles 53%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
3.08
CYNTHIA PERUSQUIA
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Diana Fonseca
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.86
Cristal Alvarez
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.79
Brenda Campos Chacon
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published 3
2.78
Dania Cuellar
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.46
CARMEN LEMUS
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Ida Santillan
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Laura Akemi Aizawa
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lilian Quinones
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Mara Culebro
usually #2 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Rocio Veronica P Cortes
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Castaneda
usually #1 Doubles 52%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published
Sofia de Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Zaira Delgado
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lilian Quinones + Cristal Alvarez8553% gamesnot enough data
Diana Fonseca + Sofia de Santiago7260% gamesnot enough data
CYNTHIA PERUSQUIA + Rocio Veronica P Cortes7173% gamesnot enough data
Dania Cuellar + CARMEN LEMUS3258% gamesnot enough data
Dania Cuellar + Cristal Alvarez224 matchesnot enough data
Ida Santillan + Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia314 matchesnot enough data
Daniela Baylon + Cristal Alvarez314 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Castaneda + Diana Fonseca303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniela Baylon
42W–21L career · 30 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Camila Olmos
28W–5L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
CYNTHIA PERUSQUIA
19W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Diana Fonseca
13W–4L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Cristal Alvarez
22W–10L career · 18 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Brenda Campos Chacon
25W–15L career · 14 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dania Cuellar
24W–15L career · 19 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
2.5
CARMEN LEMUS
33W–21L career · 24 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46
Ida Santillan
25W–13L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Akemi Aizawa
6W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lilian Quinones
12W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mara Culebro
12W–1L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia
20W–12L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rocio Veronica P Cortes
17W–2L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Castaneda
59W–46L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sofia de Santiago
15W–3L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zaira Delgado
54W–34L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.