Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 2.80 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Flight standings15 teams · 2026 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Delgado/Adult 18 & over/3.0W11152822304
2GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Baeza/EPCC#1111441639356
3GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Martinez/EPTC#3102421842423
4GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Bordier/EPTC#6102411946444
5GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Wilcox/TW#284322863528
6GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Alarcon/TW#175322862488
7GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Jabor/EPCC#275322866517
8GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Rangel/EPTC#575303069516
9GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Da Costa/EPTC#248273373550
10GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Payan/EPTC#748253575560
11GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Boss/EPTC#948174394618
12GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Arreola/EPTC#139223879574
13GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Dominguez/EPTC#839213982590
14GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Shepherd/FB111144697646
15GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Cardenas/CCC012184288589

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Deanna Parson
usually #2 Singles 39%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Carla Canales
usually #1 Singles 45%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.73
Sonia Natividad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Carmen Cardenas
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.38
Alison Leben
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 2.5
2.22
Christina Mijares
usually #3 Doubles 87%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
Gabriela Aladro Pons
usually #3 Doubles 26%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Lexi Torres
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
Lorena Sosa
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Marisela Scott
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Monica Ramirez
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 41% · published
Samantha Johnson
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
Sara Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Shannon Rhoads
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Shelley Danforth
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Stacy Mayo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Stefanie Welsch
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sonia Natividad + Lorena Sosa11454% games+9.2% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Lorena Sosa0830% games−16.7% vs expected
Carmen Cardenas + Shannon Rhoads22633% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Sosa + Stacy Mayo81644% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Danforth + Stacy Mayo5547% gamesnot enough data
Marisela Scott + Alison Leben6457% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Cardenas + Stacy Mayo0925% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Sosa + Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz0932% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Deanna Parson
17W–11L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Carla Canales
49W–56L career · 27 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
Sonia Natividad
39W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Carmen Cardenas
32W–115L career · type A · 20 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.39
2.5
Alison Leben
33W–31L career · 34 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Christina Mijares
11W–25L career · 15 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Gabriela Aladro Pons
1W–18L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lexi Torres
7W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lorena Sosa
63W–114L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mariaantonieta Sanfeliz
18W–68L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marisela Scott
18W–28L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Monica Ramirez
16W–60L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Johnson
19W–31L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sara Acevedo
18W–57L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Rhoads
36W–89L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shelley Danforth
21W–34L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacy Mayo
47W–94L career · 34 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stefanie Welsch
7W–12L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.