Teams

Dunwoody CC (Julia Southerland)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)

13 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-01-06vs Cherokee Town (Maren Alvarez)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKauleen Thatcher / Larkie Post vs Victoria E Davis / Hope Arbery0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulia Southerland / Julie Hagar vs Carrie Brune / Sandra Hyman3-6, 4-6
2021-12-16vs Dunwoody CC (Kari Lysse)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesLarkie Post / Kauleen Thatcher vs Emily Simpson / Christine Gholston6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulia Southerland vs Susan Dooley6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Hagar / Julie McKinzey vs Anissa Stewart / Melissa McIver6-1, 6-0
2021-12-09vs CC of Roswell (Lauren Caldwell)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesStewart McAnally / Amanda Hene vs Katie Watson / Regan Russo1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJulie McKinzey vs Talia Gerecitano6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Bacon / Bethany Hanak vs Candace Tucker / Samantha Carme6-4, 6-3
2021-12-02vs Cherokee Town (Maren Alvarez)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Graviss / Kristen Foley vs Martha Zazworsky / Erin Graner5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJulia Southerland vs Lisa Lombardo0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Hene / Kauleen Thatcher vs Carrie Brune / Heather Wininger0-6, 0-6
2021-11-18vs Dunwoody CC (Kari Lysse)*Won 20
W#1 DoublesSara Graviss / Julie Vanyo vs Christine Gholston / Emily Simpson6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Ray / Stewart McAnally vs Amanda Jenniges / Melissa McIver3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-09vs CC of Roswell (Lauren Caldwell)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bacon / Bethany Hanak vs Lauren Caldwell / Maggie Pitts6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKauleen Thatcher vs Regan Russo0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLarkie Post / Julie Hagar vs Nicki Hubbard / Katie Watson2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Melissa Morris70192798
2Cherokee Town (Maren Alvarez)*51162574
3The Manor (Toya Harris)*5214716174
4CC of Roswell (Lauren Caldwell)*4212612115
5Doublegate (Kristine Reising)*4213514139
6Chattahoochee River Club (Katie Sands)*4211716159
7Chattahoochee River Club (Claudia Depner)*429921171
8Lost Forrest (Leigh Blum)*43111022176
9Dunwoody CC (Julia Southerland)*3381021148
10Crooked Creek (Stephanie Lee)*3481327218
11Brookfield (Laura Legg)*2571431215
12Atlanta AC (Helen Haberstroh)*1551326206
13Doublegate (Angie Davis)*1551328208
14Edinburgh (Krista Barley)*1551330227
15White Columns (Claire Cervino)*1671429219
16The Manor (Zaina Wuest)*1661532215
17Dunwoody CC (Kari Lysse)*0601836220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Julie McKinzey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.89
Sara Graviss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Kristen Foley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Amanda Ray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bethany Hanak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Julia Southerland
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Elizabeth Bacon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Larkie Post
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Amanda Hene
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Julie Hagar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Vanyo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kauleen Thatcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Stewart McAnally
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julia Southerland + Julie McKinzey7067% games+15.3% vs expected
Kauleen Thatcher + Larkie Post123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie McKinzey
21W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
Sara Graviss
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
Kristen Foley
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Amanda Ray
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
3
Bethany Hanak
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julia Southerland
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Elizabeth Bacon
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
2.60
Larkie Post
5W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Amanda Hene
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Hagar
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Vanyo
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kauleen Thatcher
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stewart McAnally
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.