Teams

Atlanta AC (Helen Haberstroh)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)

15 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-01-13vs Edinburgh (Krista Barley)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesTeresa Oleary / Patty Sweeney vs Jill Lex / Krista Barley6-7, 7-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGinny Moody / Kathy Strickland vs Lisa Bonacorsi / Yazmin Sobh6-0, 6-0
2022-01-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Allen / Ann Hoerner vs Anna Hubbell / Nicole Lane0-6, 1-6
2021-12-16vs Doublegate (Kristine Reising)*Split 11
L#1 DoublesDanielle Robb / Ginny Moody vs Lindsey Kallos / Aruna Navathe0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Strickland / Patty Sweeney vs Fabienne Boy / Surekha Shah6-4, 7-6
L#1 DoublesMary-Stokes Koller / Leslie Stalder vs Staci Kemp / Amanda Prince1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTeresa Oleary vs Shelley Holcomb0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHelen Haberstroh / Karen Gipson vs Jamie Kelly / Amanda Ayres6-4, 3-6, 3-6
2021-12-02vs Doublegate (Angie Davis)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Crouch / Danielle Robb vs Angie Davis / Beth Peele2-6, 6-3, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKatherine Voegeli vs Angie Gue0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLucy Gray / Teresa Oleary vs Terri Hartley / Wendy Blissett6-4, 6-4
2021-12-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Allen / Kara Johnson vs Melea Connett / Kristen Neal6-7, 6-3, 3-6
2021-11-18vs EE Robinson (Jin Hahn)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCheryl Crouch / Leslie Stalder vs Yenna Park / Jin Jung2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMary-Stokes Koller vs Chang Sook Moon6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGinny Moody / Mary Kat Smith vs Su Kim / Hyunho Kim0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesKaren Gipson / Helen Haberstroh vs Luda Eyfa / Danielle Lowe7-6, 4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Melissa Morris70192798
2Cherokee Town (Maren Alvarez)*51162574
3The Manor (Toya Harris)*5214716174
4CC of Roswell (Lauren Caldwell)*4212612115
5Doublegate (Kristine Reising)*4213514139
6Chattahoochee River Club (Katie Sands)*4211716159
7Chattahoochee River Club (Claudia Depner)*429921171
8Lost Forrest (Leigh Blum)*43111022176
9Dunwoody CC (Julia Southerland)*3381021148
10Crooked Creek (Stephanie Lee)*3481327218
11Brookfield (Laura Legg)*2571431215
12Atlanta AC (Helen Haberstroh)*1551326206
13Doublegate (Angie Davis)*1551328208
14Edinburgh (Krista Barley)*1551330227
15White Columns (Claire Cervino)*1671429219
16The Manor (Zaina Wuest)*1661532215
17Dunwoody CC (Kari Lysse)*0601836220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Mary-Stokes Koller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.72
Helen Haberstroh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Patty Sweeney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.60
Leslie Stalder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Karen Gipson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Katherine Voegeli
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.45
Mary Kat Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Christin Rhodes
published 2.5
Danielle Robb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Kathy Strickland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.02
Teresa Oleary
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Cheryl Crouch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ginny Moody
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Kelly Allen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lucy Gray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Oleary + Lucy Gray4351% games+8.7% vs expected
Karen Gipson + Helen Haberstroh6651% games+1.3% vs expected
Kathy Strickland + Teresa Oleary0724% games−5.0% vs expected
Helen Haberstroh + Leslie Stalder314 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Strickland + Karen Gipson033 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Strickland + Helen Haberstroh123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary-Stokes Koller
21W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%93%4%
2.75
Helen Haberstroh
18W–33L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%92%2%
2.72
Patty Sweeney
29W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.69
Leslie Stalder
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.60
Karen Gipson
15W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
2.51
Katherine Voegeli
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.49
Mary Kat Smith
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2022
0%63%37%
2.45
2.5
Christin Rhodes
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Danielle Robb
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Strickland
9W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Teresa Oleary
14W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Cheryl Crouch
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ginny Moody
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kelly Allen
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lucy Gray
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.