Teams

Lost Forrest (Leigh Blum)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-01-13vs The Manor (Zaina Wuest)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesNicole Hecker / Anna Beck vs Mandi Bearsch / Bea Pitchford2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Surden vs Andrea Stone6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Hanilton / Karen Kelleher vs Stacey Harmon / Moji Campbell6-2, 6-1
2022-01-06vs USTA Atlanta/Melissa MorrisLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeigh Stewart Blum / Lauren Surden vs Allison Elder / Johanna Morgan1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAnnette Hodgson vs Virginia Hansbury6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Surdick / Meredith Minano vs Elsefie Retief / Andrea Gordon3-6, 1-6
2021-12-16vs Crooked Creek (Stephanie Lee)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Hodgson / Julie Worly vs Stephanie Lee / Celeste Jackson6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLeigh Stewart Blum vs Oksana Porwal6-0, 6-7, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnna Beck / Meredith Minano vs Katie Franklin / Ann-Marie Sharp4-6, 1-6
2021-12-09vs The Manor (Toya Harris)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnette Hodgson / Meredith Minano vs Toya Bush-Harris / Garman Gordon3-6, 7-5, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Surden vs Renatta Goduto3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Kelleher / Nicole Hecker vs Tashika McLeod / Chanya Peters1-6, 0-6
2021-12-02vs White Columns (Claire Cervino)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesLeigh Stewart Blum / Lauren Surden vs Janet Mun / Ashley Quackenbush6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAnnette Hodgson vs Christina Carns6-3, 6-7, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Surdick / Lauren Hanilton vs Claire Cervino / Melissa Hale4-6, 0-6
2021-11-18vs Brookfield (Laura Legg)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesLeigh Stewart Blum / Julie Worly vs Jessica Dean / Susan Stone6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLauren Surden vs Sara Maurer6-2, 2-2
W#2 DoublesAnnette Hodgson / Karen Kelleher vs Caulie Hamling / Dana Long6-2, 6-0
2021-11-11vs Milton RC (Jennifer Wells)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAnnette Hodgson / Julie Worly vs Stacey Lewis / Ryan Johnson7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLeigh Stewart Blum vs Kim Casey0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Surdick / Lauren Edelstein vs Andrea Bowes / Tracie Grodi1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · 2.5 Women (Shannon Rowe)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/Melissa Morris70192798
2Cherokee Town (Maren Alvarez)*51162574
3The Manor (Toya Harris)*5214716174
4CC of Roswell (Lauren Caldwell)*4212612115
5Doublegate (Kristine Reising)*4213514139
6Chattahoochee River Club (Katie Sands)*4211716159
7Chattahoochee River Club (Claudia Depner)*429921171
8Lost Forrest (Leigh Blum)*43111022176
9Dunwoody CC (Julia Southerland)*3381021148
10Crooked Creek (Stephanie Lee)*3481327218
11Brookfield (Laura Legg)*2571431215
12Atlanta AC (Helen Haberstroh)*1551326206
13Doublegate (Angie Davis)*1551328208
14Edinburgh (Krista Barley)*1551330227
15White Columns (Claire Cervino)*1671429219
16The Manor (Zaina Wuest)*1661532215
17Dunwoody CC (Kari Lysse)*0601836220

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Annette Hodgson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
3.05
Heather Surdick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Leigh Stewart Blum
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.00
Julie Worly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Karen Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Anna Beck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lauren Edelstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Hanilton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Surden
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Meredith Minano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nicole Hecker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Stewart Blum + Lauren Surden4164% gamesnot enough data
Heather Surdick + Lauren Edelstein033 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Stewart Blum + Julie Worly213 matchesnot enough data
Annette Hodgson + Julie Worly303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annette Hodgson
22W–14L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.11
Heather Surdick
23W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.05
Leigh Stewart Blum
19W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
Julie Worly
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
Karen Kelleher
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
Anna Beck
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Edelstein
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Hanilton
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Surden
12W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Meredith Minano
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Hecker
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.