Teams

TOC.Nealis

2023 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-13vs TOHS.DanielLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicholas Broccolo / Eric Schraibman vs Ivan Andjelkovic / Daniel McDonald1-6, 3-6
2023-05-08vs TOC.PuriLost 01
L#2 DoublesTim Sudano / Eric Schraibman vs Vijay Sharma / Siddhartha Pendharkar2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-04-29vs NRRC.KochWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Steet / Eric Schraibman vs Mike Smithson / Keith Nichols6-1, 6-0
2023-03-27vs MD.RiddickWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Nealis / Eric Schraibman vs Jonathan Fisher / Jason High4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-19vs NRRC.KochWon 10
W#2 DoublesEric Schraibman / Tim Sudano vs Jeff Hales / Timothy Russell6-0, 6-2
2023-03-11vs TOC.SpiningWon 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Steet / Eric Schraibman vs Glen Hacker / Frank Veno6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Eric Schraibman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.64
John Nealis
published
3.53
Charles Gordon
published 3.5
3.44
Ryan Goff
published
3.32
Taylor VICK
published
3.28
Joseph Holsopple
published
3.10
Thomas Steet
published
2.95
Nicholas Broccolo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Goff + Charles Gordon2743% games−5.7% vs expected
John Nealis + Taylor VICK033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eric Schraibman
65W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
John Nealis
22W–21L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Charles Gordon
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Ryan Goff
14W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
Taylor VICK
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Joseph Holsopple
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.28
Thomas Steet
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.10
Nicholas Broccolo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.