Teams

MD.Riddick

2023 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule16 played
2023-05-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesJim Riddick / John Park vs Sid Thakur / Asim Javaid6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-14vs TOC.VeerappanWon 10
W#2 DoublesJim Riddick / Christopher Frederick vs Venugopal Mallarapu / DEEPAK GAONKAR7-5, 6-3
2023-05-07vs TOC.MerckSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJim Riddick / James Moriarty vs William Adams / Nick Zelano5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJeff Moncrief / Christopher Frederick vs Matt Hankinson / Eli Jerchower6-3, 6-0
2023-05-06vs TOC.PuriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJim Riddick / Jason High vs Vishal Gupta / Ryan Jobling6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Frederick / Jonathan Fisher vs Nishant Puri / Siddhartha Pendharkar2-6, 3-6
2023-04-29vs CAS.WrightWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Park / Jim Riddick vs Tobias Bridges / James Wysocki7-5, 6-3
2023-04-23vs PW.RenkeLost 02
L#2 DoublesChristopher Frederick / Jeff Moncrief vs Joseph Neighbors / Bill Nagel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Riddick / John Park vs Kevin Fitzgerald / Julio Perez3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-04-22vs TOHS.DanielWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristopher Frederick / Chris Chuang vs Mario Karcevski / Bruce Adorian7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJim Riddick / Jason High vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-16vs TOC.SachanLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Mulkey / Christopher Frederick vs Miguel Materin / Gustavo Canteros6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-03-27vs TOC.NealisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Frederick / Jim Riddick vs Joseph Holsopple / Taylor VICK6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJonathan Fisher / Jason High vs John Nealis / Eric Schraibman6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-25vs TOC.SpiningWon 20
W#1 DoublesJim Riddick / Jason High vs Steve Pigora / Matthew Lee7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAustin Maack / Christopher Frederick vs Glen Hacker / Donald Wood7-5, 6-4
2023-03-19vs TOHS.TabelonWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Fisher / Jim Riddick vs Cliff Manion / Antonio Morgan-Lopez7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-11vs NRRC.KochWon 20
W#1 DoublesJonathan Fisher / Jim Riddick vs Ralph Koch / Chris Welch6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJason High / Austin Maack vs Mike Smithson / Timothy Russell6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-05vs TOC.GeorgeWon 10
W#3 DoublesJim Riddick / Jeff Moncrief vs John van Campen / John Noland6-2, 7-6
2023-03-04vs TOC.PuriWon 20
W#2 DoublesJohn Park / Christopher Frederick vs Nishant Puri / Vishal Gupta6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJim Riddick / Jason High vs Arshad Merchant / Dharam Bhat6-4, 6-2
2023-02-25vs CAS.WrightWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Riddick / John Park vs Morten Pedersen / James Wysocki2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChris Chuang / Jeff Moncrief vs Scott Lundy / Tom Roeder4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Frederick / Jason High vs Dustin Adams / Brendan Hagan6-0, 6-1
2023-02-19vs TOC.JayashankaranLost 01
L#3 DoublesJonathan Fisher / Christopher Frederick vs Srinivas Govindaraju / Pawan Kumar0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jim Riddick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.69
Christopher Frederick
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.57
Jeff Moncrief
published
3.51
Jonathan Fisher
published
3.48
Jason High
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.35
Chris Chuang
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Grayson Hale
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason High + Christopher Frederick12263% games+11.9% vs expected
Chris Chuang + Christopher Frederick11166% games+8.2% vs expected
Jim Riddick + Jason High271260% games−1.3% vs expected
Jim Riddick + Christopher Frederick14069% gamesnot enough data
Chris Chuang + Jason High5169% gamesnot enough data
Jim Riddick + Chris Chuang4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jim Riddick
172W–87L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Christopher Frederick
84W–39L career · 11 lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Jeff Moncrief
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
Jonathan Fisher
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.51
3.5
Jason High
135W–55L career · type A · 13 lines in 2023
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Chris Chuang
77W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Grayson Hale
5W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.