Teams

TOC.Spining

2023 CTRL Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-13vs NRRC.KochWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Malory / Donald Wood vs Jeff Hales / William Pittman6-1, 6-2
2023-05-01vs CAS.WrightWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Spining / Matthew Lee vs J Wright / Morten Pedersen7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSteve Pigora / Andy Holloman vs Tom Roeder / Walter Adamczeski6-3, 7-6
2023-04-29vs TOC.PuriWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Spining / Chris Malory vs Vishal Gupta / Ryan Jobling2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-15vs TOHS.DanielWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Spining / Matthew Lee vs David Williams / Todd Bachman7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSteve Pigora / Frank Veno vs Scott Daniel / Kevin Michaels6-0, 6-3
2023-03-25vs MD.RiddickLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Pigora / Matthew Lee vs Jim Riddick / Jason High5-7, 1-6
2023-03-11vs TOC.NealisLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonald Wood / Chris Malory vs John Nealis / Charles Gordon3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Spining / Andy Holloman vs Joseph Holsopple / Jason Fu0-6, 0-6
2023-03-04vs NRRC.KochSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChris Malory / Steve Pigora vs Ralph Koch / Jeff Hales5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Spining / Andy Holloman vs Mike Smithson / William Pittman6-0, 6-2
2023-02-25vs TOC.PuriLost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Robinson / Mark Spining vs Vishal Gupta / Ryan Jobling4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Mark Spining
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Dan Robinson
published 3.5
3.27
Andy Holloman
published 3.5
3.23
Steve Pigora
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Chris Malory
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Glen Hacker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Pigora + Glen Hacker314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mark Spining
161W–92L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Dan Robinson
12W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Andy Holloman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Steve Pigora
93W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chris Malory
74W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Glen Hacker
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.