Teams

Pavlovic/Kim/Nashville

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 Women - Thursday AM

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5, 3.0. 2.5 Women - Thursday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Stephanie Feyes
published
4.01
Celine DAmore
published 4
3.75
Katie Feyes
published
3.44
Marie Strickland
published 3.5
3.37
Jolene Chen
published
3.22
Vesna Pavlovic
published
3.13
Jennifer Roh
published
2.95
2.89
Megan McGinness
published
2.86
Amelia Stephens
published 3
2.80
Jill Labetti
published
2.80
Ahra Kim
published 3
2.77
Cynthia Madson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Feyes + Stephanie Feyes7067% games+13.1% vs expected
Ashwini Kashelikar + Vesna Pavlovic4269% games+12.4% vs expected
Ahra Kim + Vesna Pavlovic303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Feyes
34W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%33%67%
4.06
4
Celine DAmore
42W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
Katie Feyes
24W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Marie Strickland
22W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jolene Chen
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Vesna Pavlovic
36W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.22
Jennifer Roh
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Ashwini Kashelikar
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Megan McGinness
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Amelia Stephens
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
Jill Labetti
19W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Ahra Kim
15W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Cynthia Madson
23W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.