Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.5 d.Naperville Schmidt Sat 10 $22

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

21 players · average NTRP 4.28 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesRobin Kiamco / Krishna Krupal vs Arjun Murthy / CALEB SCHIFANO6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesScott Williford vs Manuel Brito Doerr3-6, 4-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Jumes / John Laurx vs Jack Wennerstrum / Jan Greszta6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesRobin Kiamco / Patrick Angelo vs Zachary Cho / Oliver Gallego4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDavid Jumes vs Joe Gasior6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Laurx / Vinod Mahalingam vs Jeff Karasinski / Matthew Smucker0-2
L#2 SinglesScott Williford vs Bharani Sankar4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJoshua Bandoch / Ricky Hernandez vs Ravi Jhaveri / Nick Werth1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Jumes vs Masanori Suzuki3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Laurx / Krishna Krupal vs Ryan Rymarzak / Peter Itskovich3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesScott Williford vs Jack Gartlan7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDavid Jumes vs Peter Shields6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJonathon Schmidt / Chris Moreno vs Brian Thomason / Thomas Tranter6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTommy Felice vs Andrew Wolfberg6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesScott Williford / Vinod Mahalingam vs Robert Rao / Douglas Weber0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM4.5 b.River Trails Tranter Thurs 7 $2461221331282
2CDTA S 18&OM4.5 e.Tam Needler Wed 7 $2252211434283
3CDTA S 18&OM4.5 f.Waveland(OUT) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $1043211433296
4CDTA S 18&OM4.5 c.Oak Brook B&T(OUT) San Luis Sat 1 $2043211434303
5CDTA S 18&OM4.5 d.Naperville Schmidt Sat 10 $2233151538262
6CDTA S 18&OM4.5 h.North Shore Sternfield Sun 4 $2034171838285
7CDTA S 18&OM4.5 g.Wheaton(OUT) Exner Sat 3 $201582246304
8CDTA S 18&OM4.5 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $281692654363

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Deniz Karacay
published 4.5
4.27
Hans-Joerg Engler
published 4.5
4.25
Tommy Felice
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.22
Scott Williford
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.12
John Laurx
published 4.5
4.11
Akshay Mehrotra
published 4.5
4.10
David Jumes
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.07
Chris Moreno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Robin Kiamco
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
David Maxson
published 4.5
3.98
Joshua Bandoch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.97
Patrick Angelo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.95
Jonathon Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Craig Keuer
published 4
3.79
Syed Jawad Gardezi
published
2.76
Eric Esancy
published 3
Krishna Krupal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Hess
published
Ricky Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sergey Burlakov
published
Vinod Mahalingam
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krishna Krupal + John Laurx15855% gamesnot enough data
Deniz Karacay + John Laurx7650% gamesnot enough data
John Laurx + Eric Esancy6647% gamesnot enough data
David Maxson + Eric Esancy7452% gamesnot enough data
Hans-Joerg Engler + John Laurx7359% gamesnot enough data
Robin Kiamco + John Laurx2737% gamesnot enough data
Hans-Joerg Engler + Chris Moreno2448% gamesnot enough data
Jonathon Schmidt + John Laurx044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deniz Karacay
102W–71L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Hans-Joerg Engler
37W–23L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
Tommy Felice
33W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
Scott Williford
18W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.22
4.5
John Laurx
188W–157L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Akshay Mehrotra
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
David Jumes
20W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Chris Moreno
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2023
30%70%<1%
4.07
Robin Kiamco
64W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
4.06
4.5
David Maxson
85W–38L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.99
Joshua Bandoch
10W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
Patrick Angelo
57W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.97
Jonathon Schmidt
18W–57L career · 1 line in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.95
4
Craig Keuer
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.86
Syed Jawad Gardezi
20W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
3
Eric Esancy
154W–187L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
Krishna Krupal
22W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Hess
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ricky Hernandez
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sergey Burlakov
14W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vinod Mahalingam
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.