Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.5 h.North Shore Sternfield Sun 4 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

15 players · average NTRP 4.40 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 SinglesMichael Baddeloo vs Manuel Brito Doerr3-1
W#1 DoublesEric H Lo / Nick Charlton-Perrin vs Peter Itskovich / Ryan Rymarzak6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEdwin Baldwin / Michael Baddeloo vs Jeff Altenau / Eddie DeLaCruz6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesGary Gerstman / Edwin Baldwin vs Ryan Pfeifle / Jeffrey Struck4-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesNick Charlton-Perrin / Michael Baddeloo vs Peter Hammond / Alistair Templeton7-5, 6-5
L#1 SinglesMikhail Gutin vs Joe Gasior6-7, 2-2
W#2 SinglesVolodymyr Zverkovsky vs Bharani Sankar7-5, 2-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEric H Lo / Jon Powell vs Oliver Gallego / Jacob Mayles4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesMichael Baddeloo / Nick Charlton-Perrin vs David Peistrup / Thomas Tranter7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesVolodymyr Zverkovsky vs Erik Watkins6-0, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEric H Lo / Brad Smith vs Robert Rao / Brian Sorich4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHan Han vs Joshua Vance6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEdwin Baldwin / Ryan Rosenthal vs Jean Michel Dos Remedios / Rod Wienke3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesBrad Smith / Jordan Goldstein vs Travis Reimers / Brian Dillman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesVolodymyr Zverkovsky vs Ryan Nosek4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Sloan / Daniel Sternfield vs Mark Exner / Arun Prakash3-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesHan Han vs Michael Yong6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGary Gerstman / Mark Sack vs Clay Corso / Anthony Noti6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM4.5 b.River Trails Tranter Thurs 7 $2461221331282
2CDTA S 18&OM4.5 e.Tam Needler Wed 7 $2252211434283
3CDTA S 18&OM4.5 f.Waveland(OUT) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $1043211433296
4CDTA S 18&OM4.5 c.Oak Brook B&T(OUT) San Luis Sat 1 $2043211434303
5CDTA S 18&OM4.5 d.Naperville Schmidt Sat 10 $2233151538262
6CDTA S 18&OM4.5 h.North Shore Sternfield Sun 4 $2034171838285
7CDTA S 18&OM4.5 g.Wheaton(OUT) Exner Sat 3 $201582246304
8CDTA S 18&OM4.5 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $281692654363

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Michael Baddeloo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.28
Han Han
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
Gary Gerstman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Nick Charlton-Perrin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Eric H Lo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Daniel Sternfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Edwin Baldwin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Brian Sloan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
John Croghan
published
Jon Powell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jordan Goldstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Sack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mikhail Gutin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ryan Rosenthal
published
Volodymyr Zverkovsky
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Baddeloo + Nick Charlton-Perrin6256% games−0.4% vs expected
Edwin Baldwin + Daniel Sternfield1634% games−12.4% vs expected
Michael Baddeloo + Eric H Lo1449% gamesnot enough data
Nick Charlton-Perrin + Eric H Lo3248% gamesnot enough data
Edwin Baldwin + Eric H Lo044 matchesnot enough data
Michael Baddeloo + Edwin Baldwin123 matchesnot enough data
Eric H Lo + Daniel Sternfield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Baddeloo
42W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Han Han
107W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Gary Gerstman
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Charlton-Perrin
34W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Eric H Lo
18W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Daniel Sternfield
9W–36L career · 1 line in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.87
4
Edwin Baldwin
17W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Brian Sloan
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
John Croghan
1W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jon Powell
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Jordan Goldstein
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mark Sack
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Mikhail Gutin
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Rosenthal
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Volodymyr Zverkovsky
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.