Teams

CDTA S 18&OM4.5 g.Wheaton(OUT) Exner Sat 3 $20

CDTA Summer Adult 18 & Over WE · WN

17 players · average NTRP 4.36 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesBrian Dillman / Mark Exner vs Brian Sorich / Connor Harmon5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey May / Whitney Brooks vs Kevin Zimmerman / Andrew Wolfberg1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesChristopher Sowers vs Erik Watkins5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesBrian Dillman / Erik Halperin vs Michael Bush / Jeffrey Struck1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesArun Prakash / Dimitar Ginev vs Ian Barr / David Polmer6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGlenn Evans / Quinton Osborne vs Brent Stern / Mark Hansen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJoshua Luetkehans / Quinton Osborne vs Matthew Smucker / Alistair Templeton1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMatthew Siami vs Joe Gasior4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Exner / Arun Prakash vs Andrew Martin / Nick Werth3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChristopher Sowers vs Zachary Cho1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWhitney Brooks / Dimitar Ginev vs Andrew Snyder / Russell Needler3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesWhitney Brooks / Jeffrey May vs Omar Qurram / Warren San Luis6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesTravis Reimers / Brian Dillman vs Brad Smith / Jordan Goldstein6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRyan Nosek vs Volodymyr Zverkovsky6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Exner / Arun Prakash vs Brian Sloan / Daniel Sternfield6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesClay Corso / Anthony Noti vs Gary Gerstman / Mark Sack3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 18&OM4.5 b.River Trails Tranter Thurs 7 $2461221331282
2CDTA S 18&OM4.5 e.Tam Needler Wed 7 $2252211434283
3CDTA S 18&OM4.5 f.Waveland(OUT) Shmigelsky Sun 7 $1043211433296
4CDTA S 18&OM4.5 c.Oak Brook B&T(OUT) San Luis Sat 1 $2043211434303
5CDTA S 18&OM4.5 d.Naperville Schmidt Sat 10 $2233151538262
6CDTA S 18&OM4.5 h.North Shore Sternfield Sun 4 $2034171838285
7CDTA S 18&OM4.5 g.Wheaton(OUT) Exner Sat 3 $201582246304
8CDTA S 18&OM4.5 a.MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $281692654363

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Joshua Luetkehans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.29
Travis Reimers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Clay Corso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Dimitar Ginev
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Erik Halperin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Brian Dillman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Mark Exner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.04
Matthew Siami
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.00
Glenn Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.98
Reid Bertsche
published 4
3.84
Anthony Noti
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Christopher Sowers
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Jeffrey May
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Nick Rost
published
Quinton Osborne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ryan Nosek
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Whitney Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joshua Luetkehans + Mark Exner5158% gamesnot enough data
Erik Halperin + Mark Exner4256% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey May + Whitney Brooks2344% gamesnot enough data
Whitney Brooks + Erik Halperin2347% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Erik Halperin134 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Travis Reimers314 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Brooks + Glenn Evans224 matchesnot enough data
Quinton Osborne + Mark Exner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joshua Luetkehans
56W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%75%25%
4.41
Travis Reimers
24W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Clay Corso
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Dimitar Ginev
29W–33L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Erik Halperin
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Brian Dillman
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Mark Exner
74W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.05
Matthew Siami
6W–19L career · 1 line in 2023
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Glenn Evans
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Reid Bertsche
45W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.98
4
Anthony Noti
32W–30L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.84
Christopher Sowers
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey May
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nick Rost
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Quinton Osborne
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ryan Nosek
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Whitney Brooks
15W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.