Teams

BC-MCC/JeffGoldman

2024 TRI LEVEL MIXED Jan · March BC LOCAL LEAGUE

23 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for March BC LOCAL LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
David Chang
published 4
3.88
Kirsten Helvey
published 4
3.80
Pamela Lopez
published
3.79
Francia Zink
published
3.42
Michael Stillman
published
3.31
Richard Hume
published 3.5
Alison Quinn
published 3.5
3.20
Mari Bellas
published
3.15
John Zink
published
3.15
Marcos Cline
published
3.02
Cameron Riddell
published 3
2.97
Russell Hossain
published
2.95
Nissa Diederich
published
2.93
Veronica Deutsch
published
2.91
Elizabeth Riddell
published
2.88
Jeff Goldman
published
2.77
Shelby Campion
published
2.44
Nahia Hossain
published
Marc Reede
published
Marci Beech
published
Melissa Fernandez
published
Tim Bixler
published
Tina Wu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Riddell + Cameron Riddell314 matchesnot enough data
Tina Wu + David Chang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Chang
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
4.24
4
Kirsten Helvey
123W–71L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
Pamela Lopez
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Francia Zink
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Michael Stillman
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Richard Hume
8W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Alison Quinn
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mari Bellas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
John Zink
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.15
Marcos Cline
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Cameron Riddell
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
Russell Hossain
17W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
2.97
Nissa Diederich
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
Veronica Deutsch
44W–93L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Elizabeth Riddell
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jeff Goldman
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Shelby Campion
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Nahia Hossain
8W–19L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.44
Marc Reede
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marci Beech
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Fernandez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Bixler
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tina Wu
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.