Teams

KH:New Ads:Gaillard

2026 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

27 players · average NTRP 3.89 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesMallory Close / Pilar Estrada vs Rachel Gigliotti / Kristen Pugno6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Rieben vs Ali Caravella6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKendal Gaillard / Cristina Casati-Lewis vs Christina OHagan / Sarah Konecke7-6, 1-4
W#3 DoublesTSU-CHUN TSUN / Anne-Nicole Hanus vs Emelyn Northway / Elena Phillips6-7, 5-2
2026-03-08vs TRC:No Love Loss:BroderickLost 12
L#1 DoublesKendal Gaillard / Mallory Close vs Elizabeth Griffin / Suzanne Crowe1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTSU-CHUN TSUN vs Brooke Craemer0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPilar Estrada / Liz Fleischman vs Karen Cushnie / Rosemary Klein4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-01vs 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/EastSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCristina Casati-Lewis / Pilar Estrada vs Meagan Schmidt / Lisa DiCandido6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Rieben vs Amy Salley3-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatarzyna Jarmoc Rakowski / TSU-CHUN TSUN vs Wendy English / Shannon Craley6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLiza Connolly / Andrea Nadel vs Jennifer Amadeo / Lynn Enquist6-3, 6-2
2026-01-18vs KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/WoodruffSplit 22
W#1 DoublesPilar Estrada / Kendal Gaillard vs Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel / Christina OHagan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTSU-CHUN TSUN vs Kristen Pugno1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWendy Hyer / Mallory Close vs Erin Harris / Melissa Welch0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesClaire Londa / Andrea Nadel vs Cornelia Toothaker / Shannon Smith6-1, 6-2
2026-01-11vs MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelisWon 31
W#1 DoublesPilar Estrada / Cristina Casati-Lewis vs Mondel Teka / Liz Herr6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJamie Behr vs Amy Kaufman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatarzyna Jarmoc Rakowski / TSU-CHUN TSUN vs Melissa Hanna / Mary Korchinski6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAndrea Nadel / Liza Connolly vs Amanda Cotter / Shannon Roper5-7, 5-6
2025-12-07vs TRC:No Love Loss:BroderickLost 13
W#1 DoublesPilar Estrada / Liz Fleischman vs Karen Cushnie / Hetal Kocinsky6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJamie Behr vs Polly Edwards1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSenta Cassell / Wendy Hyer vs Elizabeth Griffin / Claudia Lacasia2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Mercado / Andrea Nadel vs Brooke Craemer / Kristi Montanaro4-6, 4-6
2025-11-23vs MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMallory Close / Kendal Gaillard vs Jacquelyn Hutchison / Joyce Somers6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAlanna Thompson vs Shannon Roper1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSenta Cassell / Wendy Hyer vs Linda Dest / Nancy McDonough6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRebecca Chiappardi / Amy DiFiore vs Maggie Nava / Christine Valiquette4-6, 3-6
2025-11-16vs KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/WoodruffLost 13
W#1 DoublesMallory Close / Pilar Estrada vs Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel / Sarah Konecke6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAmanda Rieben vs Jori Meyer2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Mercado / Katarzyna Jarmoc Rakowski vs Melissa Welch / Erin Harris5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesOona Robinson / Milla Pospisil vs Agnes Temerowski / Jessica Holscott1-6, 2-6
2025-11-09vs 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/EastWon 31
W#1 DoublesSenta Cassell / Kendal Gaillard vs Meghan Keane / Amy Margulies3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Rieben vs Emily Keating6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesYalin Murdock / Oona Robinson vs Lisa DiCandido / Jennifer Amadeo3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Lawson / Milla Pospisil vs Shannon Craley / Danielle Muller-Yoo2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-10-26vs MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelisWon 30
W#1 DoublesSenta Cassell / Pilar Estrada vs Mondel Teka / Linda Dest7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMallory Close / Yalin Murdock vs Christine Valiquette / Kirsten Page7-6, 2-4
W#3 DoublesAndrea Nadel / Claire Londa vs Susan Haven / Maggie Nava6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0 W - 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NC:40 Love:Weitz/Campo010261027292
2KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/Woodruff010221637326
3OGT:Game, Set, Match:Myers/Corrado010191637323
4KH:New Ads:Gaillard010191741351
5MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelis010221742370
64S:Dream Team:Margulies/East010182146366
7TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick010152550370
8CP:Net Gains 40 Winter:das Neves/Sweet010142451393
9SOL:Nationals Mind Benders:Keefe010152353410

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Kendal Gaillard
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.80
Mallory Close
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.80
Andrea Nadel
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Pilar Estrada
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.78
Senta Cassell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Alanna Thompson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Cristina Casati-Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Amanda Rieben
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Katarzyna Jarmoc Rakowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Tiffany Bevacqua
published
3.71
Claire Londa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Liz Fleischman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Anne-Nicole Hanus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Marianne Kaplan
published
3.60
TSU-CHUN TSUN
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.59
Liza Connolly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Yalin Murdock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Melissa Lawson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Milla Pospisil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Rebecca Chiappardi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Wendy Hyer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Oona Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Jamie Behr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Stephanie Mercado
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Amy DiFiore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Camilla Medeiros
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Kimberly Murray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alanna Thompson + Andrea Nadel5161% games+11.0% vs expected
Stephanie Mercado + Andrea Nadel11662% games+10.9% vs expected
Kendal Gaillard + Pilar Estrada7261% games+9.6% vs expected
Andrea Nadel + Liza Connolly10166% games+7.0% vs expected
Cristina Casati-Lewis + Pilar Estrada8456% games+6.8% vs expected
Kendal Gaillard + Mallory Close23167% games+6.7% vs expected
Wendy Hyer + Marianne Kaplan4449% games+1.2% vs expected
Katarzyna Jarmoc Rakowski + Anne-Nicole Hanus111253% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendal Gaillard
95W–41L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
4.06
Mallory Close
43W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Andrea Nadel
65W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Pilar Estrada
59W–38L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Senta Cassell
114W–58L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Alanna Thompson
48W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4
Cristina Casati-Lewis
77W–98L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Amanda Rieben
17W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Katarzyna Jarmoc Rakowski
30W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Tiffany Bevacqua
46W–30L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Claire Londa
23W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Liz Fleischman
70W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Anne-Nicole Hanus
26W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Marianne Kaplan
21W–25L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.62
TSU-CHUN TSUN
146W–99L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Liza Connolly
29W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Yalin Murdock
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.54
Melissa Lawson
67W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.52
Milla Pospisil
19W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.50
Rebecca Chiappardi
15W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Wendy Hyer
196W–154L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.48
Oona Robinson
26W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Jamie Behr
165W–105L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stephanie Mercado
46W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amy DiFiore
40W–55L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Camilla Medeiros
66W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Kimberly Murray
20W–27L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.