Teams

NC:40 Love:Weitz/Campo

2026 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

23 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Allen / Cara Herdeg vs Camila Wood / Allison Gibbs6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSusanna Daniel vs Viviana Torrero6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesColleen Campo / Katherine Curtin vs Kelly Ryan-Gartrell / Lori Abrams2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Cindy Havens vs Alice Houel / Amy Melashvili6-2, 7-5
2026-03-01vs SOL:Hit and Run:TannerWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Watts / Amanda Bryan vs Elizabeth Wells / Cynthia Curry6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDevon Delaney / Deb Parnes vs Victoria Madonna / Kim Mixer2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Charlotte Allen vs Mary Mondello / Nora Holmes6-1, 7-6
W#1 DoublesSara Watts / Amanda Bryan vs Gillian Pinchin / Emily Arnone6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJanet Lawless vs Viera Jamborova4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Cramer / Devon Delaney vs Helen Chun / Felicia DeSanto6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Suh / Colleen Campo vs Sarah Liddle / Jennifer Corrado6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-01vs SOL:Hit and Run:TannerLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / ADRIENNE FULK vs Kayoko Ito / Mary Mondello3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesCindy Havens vs Lauren Rosen1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Sara Watts vs Lourdes Marti / Kim Mixer7-5, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeb Parnes / Katherine Curtin vs Ann Horowitz / Ashley Smith7-5, 6-2
2026-01-17vs SOL:Nationals Mind Benders:KeefeWon 31
L#1 DoublesLaurie Hoffman / Laura Cramer vs Denise Kodjo / Jennifer Marsh6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCharlotte Allen vs Audrey Smith6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanet Lawless / Susanna Nichols vs Jennifer Keefe / Claudia Trulli6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Cara Herdeg vs Joanna Venar / Francine Pollack6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesSara Watts / Amanda Bryan vs Katherine Harcsar / Candy Yeager6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJanet Lawless vs Frida Matute2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesADRIENNE FULK / Laura Cramer vs Roge Nesbitt / Wendy Bennett6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Sophie Porcelli vs Amy Melashvili / Alice Houel6-7, 4-6
2025-11-16vs SOL:Hit and Run:TannerWon 40
W#1 DoublesSara Watts / Amanda Bryan vs Lourdes Marti / Victoria Madonna6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSusanna Daniel vs Kim Mixer6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / Charlotte Allen vs Yukie Goda / Yumi Nagahama6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Sophie Porcelli vs Brigitte Tanner / Kristen Woll6-3, 4-5
2025-11-01vs OGT:Game, Set, Match:Myers/CorradoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSara Watts / Amanda Bryan vs Leah McVey / Satoko Tanimoto7-6, 2-5
L#1 SinglesLaurie Hoffman vs Viera Jamborova1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusanna Daniel / Marjorie Eilertsen vs Sejal Vora / Gillian Pinchin4-6, 6-5
W#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Janet Lawless vs Mariko Abdel-Rahman / Elizabeth Luth3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-10-18vs SOL:Nationals Mind Benders:KeefeWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusanna Daniel / Marjorie Eilertsen vs Olga Orgielewicz / Carolyne Rainero6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Bryan vs Jennifer Abbey7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusanna Nichols / Sophie Porcelli vs Jennifer Keefe / Kathryn Biggs6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Michele Halem vs Denise Kodjo / Jennifer Marsh3-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Allen / Laurie Hoffman vs Venus Jones / Roge Nesbitt3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSara Watts vs Katy Gonnelli6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSophie Porcelli / Susanna Nichols vs Monique Bluhm / Kaisa Elovaara6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Weitz / Susanna Daniel vs Kelly Ryan-Gartrell / Susanne Sparks6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0 W - 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NC:40 Love:Weitz/Campo010261027292
2KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/Woodruff010221637326
3OGT:Game, Set, Match:Myers/Corrado010191637323
4KH:New Ads:Gaillard010191741351
5MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelis010221742370
64S:Dream Team:Margulies/East010182146366
7TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick010152550370
8CP:Net Gains 40 Winter:das Neves/Sweet010142451393
9SOL:Nationals Mind Benders:Keefe010152353410

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Amanda Bryan
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4
3.97
Sara Watts
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.93
Charlotte Allen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.88
Susanna Daniel
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.83
Marjorie Eilertsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Laurie Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Amy Tucci
published 4
3.75
Janet Lawless
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.75
Jennifer Weitz
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
3.71
Laura Cramer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Colleen Campo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
ADRIENNE FULK
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Susan Suh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Sophie Porcelli
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Cindy Havens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.63
Margaret Steinbach
published
3.61
Cara Herdeg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Deb Parnes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Michele Halem
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Sally Connolly
published
3.48
Devon Delaney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Susanna Nichols
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Katherine Curtin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sophie Porcelli + Susanna Nichols5158% games+8.8% vs expected
Marjorie Eilertsen + Sara Watts25958% games+7.9% vs expected
Laurie Hoffman + Marjorie Eilertsen7161% games+6.0% vs expected
Cara Herdeg + Jennifer Weitz4356% games+5.5% vs expected
Amanda Bryan + Sara Watts31858% games+4.9% vs expected
Laura Cramer + Laurie Hoffman901961% games+4.9% vs expected
Katherine Curtin + Susanna Nichols201455% games+2.7% vs expected
Susanna Nichols + Marjorie Eilertsen2348% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Bryan
141W–80L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
Sara Watts
108W–46L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Charlotte Allen
75W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.93
Susanna Daniel
82W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Marjorie Eilertsen
132W–85L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
Laurie Hoffman
279W–92L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Amy Tucci
65W–34L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Lawless
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Jennifer Weitz
97W–78L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Laura Cramer
295W–127L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Colleen Campo
68W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
ADRIENNE FULK
63W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Susan Suh
27W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
Sophie Porcelli
122W–85L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Cindy Havens
57W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
Margaret Steinbach
25W–10L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Cara Herdeg
48W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Deb Parnes
119W–133L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Michele Halem
51W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Sally Connolly
52W–59L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Devon Delaney
37W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Susanna Nichols
225W–190L career · 3 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.46
4
Katherine Curtin
165W–120L career · 2 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.