Teams

TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick

2026 SCT Adult 40 & Over Women · 4.0 W - 2

21 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-08vs KH:New Ads:GaillardWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Griffin / Suzanne Crowe vs Kendal Gaillard / Mallory Close6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBrooke Craemer vs TSU-CHUN TSUN6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Cushnie / Rosemary Klein vs Pilar Estrada / Liz Fleischman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-01vs MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelisLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Griffin / Hetal Kocinsky vs Liz Herr / Mondel Teka4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Cushnie / Rosemary Klein vs Christine Valiquette / Graziana Weill4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJanel Downs / Sarah Hottois vs Susan Haven / Melissa Hanna6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-22vs MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelisLost 13
L#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Sue Broderick vs Michele Palanzo / Mondel Teka7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPolly Edwards vs Amy Kaufman2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Hottois / Rosemary Klein vs Susan Haven / Graziana Weill6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Cushnie / Suzanne Crowe vs Shannon Roper / Amanda Cotter6-0, 6-0
2026-02-08vs KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/WoodruffLost 03
L#1 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Elizabeth Griffin vs Christina OHagan / Kristen Pugno4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHetal Kocinsky / Polly Edwards vs Jori Meyer / Christine Barkley4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMeredith Naidorf / Maureen Greenberg vs Tory Woodruff / Emelyn Northway2-6, 6-6
2026-01-11vs 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/EastSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Crowe / Hetal Kocinsky vs Amy Margulies / Emily Keating3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPolly Edwards vs Amy Salley3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Griffin / Rosemary Klein vs Catherine East / Ginny Homewood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaureen Greenberg / Brooke Craemer vs Wendy English / Lisa DiCandido6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-12-07vs KH:New Ads:GaillardWon 31
L#1 DoublesKaren Cushnie / Hetal Kocinsky vs Pilar Estrada / Liz Fleischman4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesPolly Edwards vs Jamie Behr6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Griffin / Claudia Lacasia vs Senta Cassell / Wendy Hyer6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrooke Craemer / Kristi Montanaro vs Stephanie Mercado / Andrea Nadel6-4, 6-4
2025-11-23vs 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/EastLost 12
L#1 DoublesSue Broderick / Hetal Kocinsky vs Amy Margulies / Emily Keating1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Cushnie / Rosemary Klein vs Catherine East / Amy Salley6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJanel Downs / Meredith Naidorf vs Jennifer Amadeo / Meghan Keane4-6, 6-6
2025-11-09vs MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelisSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDeirdre Andreoli / Claudia Lacasia vs Mondel Teka / Liz Herr3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBrooke Craemer vs Melissa Hanna6-4, 5-4
W#2 DoublesRosemary Klein / Karen Cushnie vs Nancy McDonough / Graziana Weill7-6, 6-6
L#3 DoublesRabia Hayden / Gretchen Hoffmann vs Jacquelyn Hutchison / Mary Korchinski0-6, 5-7
2025-10-26vs KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/WoodruffSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRabia Hayden / Deirdre Andreoli vs Christina OHagan / Sarah Konecke0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBrooke Craemer vs Kristen Pugno6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Griffin / Melissa Edwards vs Jori Meyer / Cornelia Toothaker4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Cushnie / Rosemary Klein vs Agnes Temerowski / Elena Phillips3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-10-19vs 4S:Dream Team:Margulies/EastLost 13
W#1 DoublesJane Kim / Gretchen Hoffmann vs Amy Salley / Meagan Schmidt6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBrooke Craemer vs Emily Keating4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Griffin / Hetal Kocinsky vs Catherine East / Ginny Homewood5-7, 6-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Lacasia / Melissa Edwards vs Jennifer Amadeo / Lisa DiCandido4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0 W - 2
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NC:40 Love:Weitz/Campo010261027292
2KH:Serves You Right:Meyer/Woodruff010221637326
3OGT:Game, Set, Match:Myers/Corrado010191637323
4KH:New Ads:Gaillard010191741351
5MIT:BB's 40 :DeAngelis010221742370
64S:Dream Team:Margulies/East010182146366
7TRC:No Love Loss:Broderick010152550370
8CP:Net Gains 40 Winter:das Neves/Sweet010142451393
9SOL:Nationals Mind Benders:Keefe010152353410

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Suzanne Crowe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
Claudia Lacasia
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.84
Polly Edwards
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
Sarah Hottois
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.76
Sue Broderick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
3.68
Hetal Kocinsky
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Meredith Naidorf
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.62
Karen Cushnie
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.61
Brooke Craemer
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.60
Maureen Greenberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Mary Zubrinsky
published
3.58
Rosemary Klein
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.54
Melissa Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.54
Deirdre Andreoli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Kristi Montanaro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Gretchen Hoffmann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.43
Rabia Hayden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Elizabeth Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.40
Janel Downs
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Jane Kim
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rabia Hayden + Kristi Montanaro17560% games+8.6% vs expected
Gretchen Hoffmann + Kristi Montanaro4164% games+8.4% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Claudia Lacasia1551% games+6.7% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Rosemary Klein10658% games+5.0% vs expected
Sarah Hottois + Sue Broderick8460% games+4.3% vs expected
Claudia Lacasia + Deirdre Andreoli10654% games+3.5% vs expected
Sue Broderick + Mary Zubrinsky311554% games+2.5% vs expected
Karen Cushnie + Rosemary Klein7653% games+1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Crowe
17W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Claudia Lacasia
154W–83L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Polly Edwards
172W–106L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
Sarah Hottois
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
Sue Broderick
149W–98L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Allison DiVincenzo
17W–17L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Hetal Kocinsky
50W–60L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
Meredith Naidorf
78W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.64
Karen Cushnie
80W–86L career · 7 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Brooke Craemer
56W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.61
Maureen Greenberg
35W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.60
Mary Zubrinsky
57W–38L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Rosemary Klein
46W–57L career · 7 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Melissa Edwards
170W–169L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Deirdre Andreoli
42W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.54
Kristi Montanaro
53W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Gretchen Hoffmann
50W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Rabia Hayden
40W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
4
Elizabeth Griffin
60W–57L career · 7 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
3.42
Janel Downs
140W–94L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.40
Jane Kim
124W–58L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.