Teams

Team 4 RBGCC

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-20vs Team 1Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Tolley / Mel Wesley vs Federico Volpino / David Parks6-7, 0-3
L#2 DoublesJames Colucci / Emil Valle vs Desmond LaMar / Alberto Zapata6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-07-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesMel Wesley / James Colucci vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-13vs Team 2 RJ Tennis All StarsLost 01
L#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Adinarayana Kalluru6-4, 1-4
2022-07-06vs Team 1Won 10
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs EDWARD CHATTERS6-0, 6-0
2022-06-29vs Team 5 RacqueteersSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs Daniel Aronowitz3-6, 2-5
W#2 DoublesJohn DeMoors / Emil Valle vs Syed Ahmad / Adnan Sadiq6-0, 6-1
2022-06-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJack Barufka / Mel Wesley vs Audie Blancaflor / Daniel Kim5-7, 2-4
2022-06-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesMel Wesley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Mel Wesley
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.18
Mario Levine
published
2.82
David Tolley
published 3
2.78
Emil Valle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
2.65
James Colucci
published 3
John DeMoors
published
Kate Wesley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emil Valle + Mel Wesley9459% gamesnot enough data
Mel Wesley + Mario Levine033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mel Wesley
145W–106L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Mario Levine
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3
David Tolley
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Emil Valle
52W–85L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Allen Amir Parvizian
26W–25L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
3
James Colucci
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
John DeMoors
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kate Wesley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.