Teams

Team 1

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-20vs Team 4 RBGCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesFederico Volpino / David Parks vs David Tolley / Mel Wesley7-6, 3-0
W#2 DoublesDesmond LaMar / Alberto Zapata vs James Colucci / Emil Valle2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesDesmond LaMar / David Parks vs Dean Sonderegger / Gary Lawson6-3, 6-1
2022-07-10vs Team 2 RJ Tennis All StarsLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Parks / Curtis Fisher vs Yong Jae Lee / Fred Stein2-6, 6-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Brown / EDWARD CHATTERS vs Thomas Zavilla / Robert Etheridge3-6, 3-6
2022-07-06vs Team 4 RBGCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesCurtis Fisher / David Parks vs Jack Barufka / James Colucci4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEDWARD CHATTERS vs Mel Wesley0-6, 0-6
2022-06-30vs Team 3 Unstrung HeroesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCurtis Fisher / David Parks vs Edwin McNicholas / Gary Lawson7-5, 4-3
L#2 DoublesDesmond LaMar / EDWARD CHATTERS vs Gehret Shemeld / David Schnedar4-6, 4-6
2022-06-26vs Team 5 RacqueteersLost 02
L#1 SinglesDesmond LaMar vs Adnan Karimi4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEDWARD CHATTERS / Tadeo Martinez vs Daniel Aronowitz / Keith Wojciech2-6, 0-6
2022-06-24vs Team 5 RacqueteersLost 02
L#1 DoublesDesmond LaMar / Alberto Zapata vs Adnan Karimi / Keith Wojciech1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Brown / EDWARD CHATTERS vs Sameer Farah / Luan Nguyen1-6, 0-6
2022-06-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEDWARD CHATTERS / Curtis Fisher vs Audie Blancaflor / Daniel Kim1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
David Parks
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Tyler Duvall
published
2.79
Desmond LaMar
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Alberto Zapata
published 3
2.56
EDWARD CHATTERS
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.39
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Desmond LaMar + David Parks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Parks
76W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08
Tyler Duvall
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Desmond LaMar
101W–129L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Alberto Zapata
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
EDWARD CHATTERS
21W–56L career · 6 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
2.56
3
Nicholas Laliberte
12W–45L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.