Teams

Team 5 Racqueteers

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-20vs Team 2 RJ Tennis All StarsWon 10
W#2 DoublesChuck Lutes / Keith Wojciech vs Robert Etheridge / Thomas Zavilla7-5, 7-5
2022-07-18vs Team 4 RBGCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs David Tolley7-6, 2-2
2022-07-14vs Team 3 Unstrung HeroesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Aronowitz / Chuck Lutes vs Paul Reid / David Schnedar3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-07-06vs Team 2 RJ Tennis All StarsLost 02
L#1 DoublesSameer Farah / Daniel Aronowitz vs Yong Jae Lee / Alexander Sears2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChuck Lutes / Luan Nguyen vs Matthew Plishker / John Zott2-6, 1-6
2022-06-29vs Team 4 RBGCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesDaniel Aronowitz vs Mel Wesley6-3, 5-2
2022-06-26vs Team 1Won 20
W#1 SinglesAdnan Karimi vs Desmond LaMar6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniel Aronowitz / Keith Wojciech vs EDWARD CHATTERS / Tadeo Martinez6-2, 6-0
2022-06-24vs Team 1Won 20
W#1 DoublesAdnan Karimi / Keith Wojciech vs Desmond LaMar / Alberto Zapata6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDaniel Aronowitz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-17vs Team 3 Unstrung HeroesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChuck Lutes / Lawrence Silver vs John Williamson / Dean Sonderegger4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAdnan Karimi / Adnan Sadiq vs Edwin McNicholas / Gary Lawson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Hassaan Karim
published 3.5
3.03
Adnan Karimi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Luan Nguyen
published
Daniel Aronowitz
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Sameer Farah
published
2.48
Chuck Lutes
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Keith Wojciech
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adnan Karimi + Sameer Farah123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hassaan Karim
14W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Adnan Karimi
119W–128L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
Luan Nguyen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Daniel Aronowitz
43W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sameer Farah
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Chuck Lutes
14W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Keith Wojciech
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.