Teams

The Super Seniors

2025 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 3.56 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Baughman/65&Over8.0M701926108
2The Super Seniors0721939238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Bruce Goslovich
published 4
3.47
Jake Putnam
published 3.5
3.28
James Elliott
published 3.5
3.27
DOUGLAS de BURGH
published 3.5
Christopher Lind
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Fritz Durham
published 3.5
3.25
Dave Keim
published 3.5
3.15
Lynn Coltrin
published 3.5
3.11
Dave Landis
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Goslovich + Jake Putnam3448% games+0.7% vs expected
Lynn Coltrin + James Elliott71345% games−12.5% vs expected
DOUGLAS de BURGH + Christopher Lind241852% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + DOUGLAS de BURGH5550% gamesnot enough data
James Elliott + Christopher Lind4448% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + DOUGLAS de BURGH2545% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Christopher Lind0637% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Coltrin + Fritz Durham1539% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Goslovich
47W–47L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
3.5
Jake Putnam
43W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
James Elliott
95W–93L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
DOUGLAS de BURGH
72W–45L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christopher Lind
20W–18L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Fritz Durham
85W–91L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dave Keim
51W–109L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Lynn Coltrin
87W–108L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Dave Landis
71W–99L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.