Teams

Idaho/Baughman/65&Over8.0M

2025 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 3.92 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-03vs The Super SeniorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Buckingham / Phil Ellis vs Jake Putnam / Bruce Goslovich6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2025-08-25vs The Super SeniorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Buckingham / Victor Allen vs Jake Putnam / Bruce Goslovich2-6, 3-6
2025-08-18vs The Super SeniorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Buckingham / Phil Ellis vs Jake Putnam / Bruce Goslovich6-2, 6-0
2025-08-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesMike Buckingham / Victor Allen vs Lynn Coltrin / Dave Landis6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Baughman/65&Over8.0M701926108
2The Super Seniors0721939238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kimbell Gourley
published 4.5
4.11
Mike Buckingham
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.92
Daniel Friend
published 4
3.88
Buckner Harris
published 4
3.87
Jeff Seals
published 4
3.87
Jeffrey Trask
published 4
3.75
Karl Baughman
published 4
3.74
Robert Welch
published 4
3.69
Jeffrey Henken
published 4
3.60
Phil Ellis
published 3.5
3.37
Russell Moorhead
published 3.5
3.31
Victor Allen
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Ellis + Kimbell Gourley8076% games+12.5% vs expected
Buckner Harris + Karl Baughman25857% games+5.1% vs expected
Jeff Seals + Karl Baughman14657% games+1.1% vs expected
Jeffrey Henken + Karl Baughman7258% games−0.8% vs expected
Jeffrey Henken + Jeffrey Trask22955% games−4.0% vs expected
Jeffrey Henken + Buckner Harris10659% games−6.5% vs expected
Victor Allen + Jeff Seals18658% games−6.9% vs expected
Phil Ellis + Robert Welch12854% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kimbell Gourley
36W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.29
4
Mike Buckingham
137W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Daniel Friend
53W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Buckner Harris
107W–68L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Jeff Seals
93W–48L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Jeffrey Trask
45W–49L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Karl Baughman
180W–94L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Robert Welch
61W–40L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Jeffrey Henken
104W–59L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Phil Ellis
65W–31L career · no lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.60
3.5
Russell Moorhead
110W–102L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Victor Allen
69W–54L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.