Teams

LVTA ORANGE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-12vs HMTC TEALWon 30
W#1 DoublesConnie Erickson / Karen Pielin vs Karen Johnson / Rosalie Krammer6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Hansen / Dena Stark vs Mary Gabiola / Cathy Simon6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVicky Hadley / Sue Schneider vs Diane Westlind / Mel Fernandez6-0, 7-6
2024-06-05vs TAG BLUESplit 11
L#2 DoublesKaren Lumpkin / Judy O'Gorman vs Becky Buhler / Joyce Hirano-Kuznik2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDena Stark / Connie Erickson vs Michelle Sheets / Marcia Stauter6-4, 6-2
2024-05-29vs WYO BROWNLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Karen Lumpkin vs Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Priscilla Gill6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSue Schneider / Dena Stark vs Megan Hayes / Judith Loomis6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-22vs FCCC REDSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Karen Lumpkin vs Holly K. Brown / Kim McConnellogue6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesConnie Erickson / Dena Stark vs Karen Preiss / Jennifer Camp5-7, 1-6
2024-05-15vs MLF YELLOWWon 20
W#2 DoublesDena Stark / Karen Pielin vs Teresa Nornes / Janet Elliott6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVicky Hadley / Debbie Hansen vs Kathy Petersen / Leticia Dunn6-3, 6-4
2024-05-08vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Dawn Hagen vs Lori Loeb / Gina Hastings6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKaren Pielin / Sue Schneider vs Adrienne LeBailly / Sara Mullarkey4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-01vs FCCC PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy O'Gorman / Dawn Hagen vs Melissa King / Karen Weller7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDena Stark / Vicky Hadley vs Kelly Day / Lisa Clay6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Pflughoeft / Debbie Hansen vs Jane Gronewoller / Sara Gilmore6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jill Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Connie Erickson
published 3.5
3.34
Debbie Hansen
published 3.5
3.27
Vicky Hadley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dawn Hagen
published 3.5
3.23
Judy O'Gorman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Karen Pielin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Dena Stark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Nancy Pflughoeft
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.67
Sue Schneider
published
Karen Lumpkin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Hansen + Nancy Pflughoeft7457% games+4.5% vs expected
Connie Erickson + Karen Pielin7650% games−0.7% vs expected
Judy O'Gorman + Nancy Pflughoeft3746% games−5.9% vs expected
Karen Pielin + Sue Schneider3446% gamesnot enough data
Jill Brooks + Dawn Hagen5255% gamesnot enough data
Judy O'Gorman + Dawn Hagen314 matchesnot enough data
Vicky Hadley + Debbie Hansen044 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Hagen + Nancy Pflughoeft224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Brooks
79W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.83
3.5
Connie Erickson
22W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Debbie Hansen
51W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Vicky Hadley
29W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dawn Hagen
43W–35L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Judy O'Gorman
58W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Karen Pielin
65W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Dena Stark
93W–57L career · 6 lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Nancy Pflughoeft
60W–97L career · 2 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
Sue Schneider
11W–34L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
Karen Lumpkin
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.