Teams

FCCC PURPLE

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-12vs WYO BROWNWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Day / Jane Gronewoller vs Priscilla Gill / Patricia Hansen6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBetsy Markey / Jenny McCulloch vs Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Judith Loomis2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-29vs MLF YELLOWSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisa Clay / Jane Gronewoller vs Marsha Conley / Betty Gonzales2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBetsy Markey / Jenny McCulloch vs Laura Johnson / Teresa Nornes6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-22vs CSU GREENSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJane Gronewoller / Lisa Clay vs Celeste Blackburn / Sara Mullarkey4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelly Day / Betsy Markey vs Tracey Foundoulis / Adrienne LeBailly2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-15vs FCCC REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesBetsy Markey / Jenny McCulloch vs Tahni Clay / Kaylyn Shelby3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Day / Jane Gronewoller vs Jennifer Camp / Holly K. Brown2-6, 1-6
2024-05-01vs LVTA ORANGELost 01
L#3 DoublesJane Gronewoller / Sara Gilmore vs Nancy Pflughoeft / Debbie Hansen2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Karen Weller
published
3.13
Kelly Day
published
3.12
Betsy Markey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Jane Gronewoller
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Lisa Clay
published
Jenny McCulloch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Gronewoller + Karen Weller3549% games+1.3% vs expected
Jane Gronewoller + Kelly Day2538% games−15.3% vs expected
Karen Weller + Lisa Clay224 matchesnot enough data
Jane Gronewoller + Lisa Clay123 matchesnot enough data
Jenny McCulloch + Karen Weller123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Clay + Kelly Day123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Weller
11W–28L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Kelly Day
9W–21L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Betsy Markey
21W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jane Gronewoller
72W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lisa Clay
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Jenny McCulloch
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.