Teams

WYO BROWN

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.21 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-12vs FCCC PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Gill / Patricia Hansen vs Kelly Day / Jane Gronewoller3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJanet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Judith Loomis vs Betsy Markey / Jenny McCulloch6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Schultz / Adelle Byra vs Melissa King / Karen Weller7-6, 6-4
2024-06-05vs FCCC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Pajak / Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal vs Kelli Barber / Karen Preiss2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Judith Loomis vs Robyn Brady / Melissa Conlon7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCindy Schultz / Adelle Byra vs Holly K. Brown / Tahni Clay4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-05-29vs LVTA ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJanet Stanforth-Nachtigal / Priscilla Gill vs Nancy Pflughoeft / Karen Lumpkin7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDebra Olson / Ginger Paige vs Debbie Hansen / Connie Erickson2-6, 1-6
2024-05-22vs MLF YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesPennie Weir / Tracy Dooley vs Debora J Miller / Betty Gonzales2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Hansen / Adelle Byra vs Marsha Conley / Pat Athey3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Olson / Cindy Schultz vs Janet Elliott / Leticia Dunn6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-15vs TAG BLUELost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Hansen / Ginger Paige vs Janice Mossberg / Falguni Gill6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Priscilla Gill vs Janet Crespin / Laura Dunn0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdelle Byra / Nancy Pajak vs Joyce Hirano-Kuznik / Marcia Stauter4-6, 3-6
2024-05-08vs HMTC TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracy Dooley / Pennie Weir vs Karen Johnson / Katie Schmieden6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAdelle Byra / Patricia Hansen vs Mary Gabiola / Sandra Barnes6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDebra Olson / Cindy Schultz vs Teresa Adsit / Cathy Simon3-6, 4-6
2024-05-01vs CSU GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Nancy Pajak vs Susan Davidson / Konnie Kosek2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 7.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cindy Schultz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Ginger Paige
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Patricia Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Priscilla Gill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Nancy Pajak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Adelle Byra
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Debra Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Pennie Weir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Judith Loomis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Hayes
published
Tracy Dooley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Hansen + Ginger Paige81142% games−10.1% vs expected
Nancy Pajak + Adelle Byra2635% games−13.4% vs expected
Debra Olson + Cindy Schultz5452% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Hansen + Nancy Pajak4248% gamesnot enough data
Debra Olson + Ginger Paige1535% gamesnot enough data
Priscilla Gill + Judith Loomis0533% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Dooley + Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal404 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Hansen + Adelle Byra134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cindy Schultz
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Ginger Paige
27W–57L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Patricia Hansen
26W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.16
3
Priscilla Gill
36W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Nancy Pajak
56W–74L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Adelle Byra
18W–27L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Debra Olson
15W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.59
Pennie Weir
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
86%14%<1%
2.36
Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Judith Loomis
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Hayes
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tracy Dooley
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.