Teams

Robertson - Rose All Play

2025 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-09-27vs Zhao - The AvengersWon 10
W#2 SinglesAnto Faini vs Tracy Brandt6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-08vs YangWon 20
W#2 SinglesAnto Faini vs Lynda Nguyen6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Yurong Zhang6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-16vs Zhao - The AvengersWon 10
W#2 SinglesAlison Serino vs Tana Jankowiak6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2025-08-07vs Henkin - Serve & Folly SinglesWon 10
W#1 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Penelope Bell6-3, 6-4
2025-07-29vs YangSplit 11
L#2 SinglesAlison Serino vs Yucong Gao3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesSandy Thongphok vs Lynda Nguyen6-3, 6-4
2025-07-23vs Shaffer - Alley CatsWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlison Serino vs Lelia True6-2, 7-5
W#3 SinglesAnto Faini vs TingTing Du5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-19vs Du - Honey Deuce 3.5Lost 01
L#3 SinglesLucy Yun Yuan vs Bella Bidzhieva1-6, 2-6
2025-07-10vs Henkin - Serve & Folly SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesAnto Faini vs Claudia Guardia6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Kim Atkinson
published
3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.67
Sherra Dung
published
3.67
Desiree Drakakis
published 4
3.66
Anto Faini
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.56
Sandy Thongphok
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.55
Jennifer Yang
published
3.49
Alison Serino
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Sheila O'Connell
published
3.33
Lucy Yun Yuan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Ellen Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Yang + Anto Faini4159% games−0.3% vs expected
Sandy Thongphok + Anto Faini131152% games−1.5% vs expected
Jennifer Yang + Desiree Drakakis123 matchesnot enough data
Sheila O'Connell + Anto Faini303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Atkinson
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Sherra Dung
12W–7L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Desiree Drakakis
20W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
3.5
Anto Faini
226W–104L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.66
3.5
Sandy Thongphok
276W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Jennifer Yang
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
3.5
Alison Serino
162W–124L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Sheila O'Connell
23W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Lucy Yun Yuan
48W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Ellen Lee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.