Teams

Zhao - The Avengers

2025 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-09-27vs Robertson - Rose All PlayLost 02
L#1 SinglesShuying Zhao vs Ellen Lee0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTracy Brandt vs Anto Faini4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-20vs Henkin - Serve & Folly SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesTana Jankowiak vs Tamar Henkin6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesShuying Zhao vs Tanna Nelson3-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Robin Rudowitz6-3, 6-2
2025-09-13vs Du - Honey Deuce 3.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Wenxi Li2-6, 1-6
2025-08-23vs YangSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Reidy vs Yucong Gao4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Hazel Yang6-1, 6-2
2025-08-19vs Henkin - Serve & Folly SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Caroline Storer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-16vs Robertson - Rose All PlayLost 02
L#2 SinglesTana Jankowiak vs Alison Serino0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTracy Brandt vs Jennifer Yang2-6, 6-7
2025-08-01vs Du - Honey Deuce 3.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesTana Jankowiak vs Bella Bidzhieva6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJennifer Reidy vs Xuan Du6-2, 6-1
2025-07-26vs YangSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Yucong Gao1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Reidy vs Hazel Yang6-2, 6-2
2025-07-18vs Shaffer - Alley CatsWon 21
W#1 SinglesTana Jankowiak vs Lesli Thompson7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTracy Brandt vs Denise Levis6-3, 6-0
L#3 SinglesShuying Zhao vs TingTing Du2-6, 0-6
2025-07-08vs Shaffer - Alley CatsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesTana Jankowiak vs Ruth Go Fernando Randle6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesShuying Zhao vs Lelia True1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Tana Jankowiak
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.60
Sueyun Hsieh
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.59
Jennifer Reidy
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Tracy Brandt
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Qing Lin
published
3.01
Wenbo Li
published
2.98
Shuying Zhao
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.52
Lemin Xiao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Reidy + Tracy Brandt12361% games+10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tana Jankowiak
96W–69L career · 5 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Sueyun Hsieh
141W–113L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Jennifer Reidy
46W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Tracy Brandt
74W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
Qing Lin
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Wenbo Li
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Shuying Zhao
42W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.