Teams

GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Correa/EPCC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rojas/EPTC#37117717154
2GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Marquez/EPTC#27117717169
3GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Correa/EPCC#16218615151
4GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Boney/EPTC#46217716145
5GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Galindo/EPTC#535101433234
6GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/McCarthy/EPTC#13591533228
7GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rios/TW2681632209
8GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Pace/CCC1761837244
9GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Hufft/FB1761838242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Cortney Shimunov
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3
2.75
Alejandra Beltran
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Allison Marshall
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3
2.35
Brianda Van
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 2.5
2.24
Christine Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 2.5
Gabriela Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Jessica Bordier
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Nydia Correa
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Stacey Schaber
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Victoria Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 34% · published
Yadira Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Victoria Dominguez + Stacey Schaber15951% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Bordier + Cortney Shimunov9075% gamesnot enough data
Brianda Van + Gabriela Navarro3549% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Dominguez + Alejandra Beltran3254% gamesnot enough data
Victoria Dominguez + Christine Gomez224 matchesnot enough data
Nydia Correa + Christine Gomez134 matchesnot enough data
Brianda Van + Christine Gomez123 matchesnot enough data
Yadira Gonzalez + Jessica Bordier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cortney Shimunov
32W–3L career · 30 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.30
3
Alejandra Beltran
14W–7L career · 10 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Allison Marshall
6W–8L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
Brianda Van
21W–27L career · 20 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Christine Gomez
19W–30L career · 25 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Gabriela Navarro
32W–21L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jessica Bordier
36W–9L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nydia Correa
9W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stacey Schaber
25W–17L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victoria Dominguez
34W–31L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yadira Gonzalez
25W–23L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.