Teams

GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Galindo/EPTC#5

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNayeli Moreno / Andrea Prado vs Idaly Rios / Hadley Huchton0-6, 0-6
2025-10-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSuleima Villa / Liliana De Castro vs Monica Pineda / Sylvia Anaya0-6, 0-6
2025-10-13Won 20
W#1 DoublesValeria Amato / Nayeli Moreno vs Hossana Gallegos / Diana M Perez7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCristina Castro / Andrea Prado vs Stephanie Rice / Cristina Provencio6-2, 6-0
2025-09-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesValentina Muir / Liliana De Castro vs Perla Carrillo / Naomi Ramirez Aizawa0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rojas/EPTC#37117717154
2GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Marquez/EPTC#27117717169
3GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Correa/EPCC#16218615151
4GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Boney/EPTC#46217716145
5GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Galindo/EPTC#535101433234
6GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/McCarthy/EPTC#13591533228
7GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rios/TW2681632209
8GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Pace/CCC1761837244
9GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Hufft/FB1761838242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.28 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
AnaKaren Aldana
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Andrea Prado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Cristina Castro
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 2.5
Liliana De Castro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nayeli Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Nayely Ruiz
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Suleima Villa
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Valentina Muir
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Valeria Amato
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suleima Villa + Valentina Muir4643% gamesnot enough data
Nayeli Moreno + Cristina Castro134 matchesnot enough data
Suleima Villa + Nayely Ruiz033 matchesnot enough data
Nayely Ruiz + Nayeli Moreno213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
AnaKaren Aldana
3W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Andrea Prado
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Cristina Castro
6W–6L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Liliana De Castro
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nayeli Moreno
12W–14L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nayely Ruiz
14W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suleima Villa
21W–30L career · 32 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valentina Muir
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valeria Amato
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.