Teams

GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/McCarthy/EPTC#1

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnalisa Cordova / Rachel Wallace vs Stefanie Welsch / Monica Ramirez4-6, 1-6
2025-11-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCristina Provencio / Clara C Esparza vs Fabianna Gonzalez / Ana Krystel Heras2-6, 3-6
2025-10-20vs GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rios/TWLost 01
L#2 DoublesRachel Wallace / Yvonne Gomez vs Sonia Quiroz / Dana Buntyn0-6, 0-6
2025-09-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesClara C Esparza vs Yadira Gonzalez1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rojas/EPTC#37117717154
2GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Marquez/EPTC#27117717169
3GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Correa/EPCC#16218615151
4GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Boney/EPTC#46217716145
5GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Galindo/EPTC#535101433234
6GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/McCarthy/EPTC#13591533228
7GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Rios/TW2681632209
8GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Pace/CCC1761837244
9GEPTA/18&over/2.5W/Hufft/FB1761838242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Diana M Perez
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 2.5
Clara C Esparza
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.11
Cecilia Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.91
Analisa Cordova
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.83
Cristina Provencio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Erica Sheid
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Esther McCarthy
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Gabriela Marquez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Hossana Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Isabella Arias
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Rachel Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Rice
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Veronicq Gallegos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Yvonne Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Esther McCarthy + Cecilia Delgado1440% gamesnot enough data
Esther McCarthy + Hossana Gallegos3253% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Delgado + Diana M Perez3255% gamesnot enough data
Hossana Gallegos + Diana M Perez2347% gamesnot enough data
Clara C Esparza + Cecilia Delgado134 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Wallace + Cecilia Delgado134 matchesnot enough data
Analisa Cordova + Gabriela Marquez123 matchesnot enough data
Cecilia Delgado + Hossana Gallegos213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Diana M Perez
10W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Clara C Esparza
16W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Cecilia Delgado
27W–43L career · 27 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Analisa Cordova
7W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.91
2.5
Cristina Provencio
0W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83
Erica Sheid
5W–11L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Esther McCarthy
74W–87L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gabriela Marquez
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Hossana Gallegos
18W–27L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Isabella Arias
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Wallace
6W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Rice
3W–8L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Veronicq Gallegos
4W–8L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Yvonne Gomez
5W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.