Teams

BH - Brignac/Jones

2023 B'ham Tri-Level Weeknight - 18 & Over M · W

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Anne Matthews
published 4.5
3.88
Maggie Misner
published 4
3.74
Kathleen Stallings
published
3.65
Margaret Lacey
published
3.48
Elizabeth Karst
published
3.48
Elizabeth Pilcher
published
3.46
Kacy Carroll
published
3.33
Pamela White
published
2.84
Jill Deer
published
2.64
Haley Brignac
published
2.54
Victoria Hastings
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Matthews + Maggie Misner2350% gamesnot enough data
Anne Matthews + Kathleen Stallings213 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Stallings + Maggie Misner303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Matthews
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4
Maggie Misner
74W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
Kathleen Stallings
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Margaret Lacey
50W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.65
Elizabeth Karst
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Elizabeth Pilcher
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
Kacy Carroll
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
Pamela White
31W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
Jill Deer
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Haley Brignac
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
2.64
Victoria Hastings
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.