Teams

CDTA S 40&OW4.0 c.MT Bann Coy Tues 6:30 $25

CDTA Summer Adult 40 & Over WE · WN

16 players · average NTRP 3.85 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-25vs CDTA S 40&OW4.0 e.Tam Lund Mon 7 $22Split 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Coy / Susan Kalina vs Anna Gjerlow / Jennifer Koo6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNarissa Breger / Molly Shapiro vs Laura Purcell / Dawn Pollack3-6, 3-5
L#1 DoublesDani Zepeda / Kristen Coy vs Christine Meade / Martha Davis4-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesMolly Shapiro / Rosemary Wheeler vs Erica Eisner / Jean Soh4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Kalina / Narissa Breger vs Stephanie Thompson / Maria Lobo-Corey4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Ewaldz / Lisa Potash vs Lara Phillips / Erin Wyatt1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Schwan / Susan Kalina vs Linda Borst / Zagorka James4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesDani Zepeda / Kristen Coy vs Maureen Porter / Colleen Stover5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Potash / Rosemary Wheeler vs Tracie Wilcox / Ann Murtaugh4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Kalina / Narissa Breger vs Tracy Richards / Margaret Chung7-6, 3-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKristen Coy / Dani Zepeda vs Sara Marberry / Gayle Dominicis7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Potash / Viktorya Sokol vs Heidi Nickel / Cheryl Watkins3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristine Blaser vs Ellen Phillips1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Potash / Molly Shapiro vs Anna Dau / Mary Cooper7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Schmidt / Susan Kalina vs Rochelle Meng / Pam Fisher3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKristen Coy / Molly Shapiro vs Ginger Riessen / Alicja Kujalowicz6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristine Blaser vs Denise Huth6-4, 4-3
W#3 DoublesSheila Bondoc / Lisa Potash vs Kara Levin / Debbie Skowron6-3, 7-5
W#1 DoublesDani Zepeda / Kristen Coy vs Christine Masini / Nancy Manolis6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMolly Shapiro / Sophia Koliatsis vs Jennifer Nemec / Patty Kulpins6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 40&OW4.0 a.Oak Brook Lukas Tues 7 $207127517214
2CDTA S 40&OW4.0 f.Tam Corey Sun 11 $2262201226246
3CDTA S 40&OW4.0 b.MT Bann Starkman Tues 6:30 $2553171534253
4CDTA S 40&OW4.0 d.Barrington Gray Sat 9 $2053171534280
5CDTA S 40&OW4.0 e.Tam Lund Mon 7 $2235131938281
6CDTA S 40&OW4.0 i.Hinsdale Cashman Sat 12 $2235151740288
7CDTA S 40&OW4.0 g.River Trails Jasinski Tue 7 $2435102246306
8CDTA S 40&OW4.0 h.Forest View Hayashida Mon 7 $2126141842318
9CDTA S 40&OW4.0 c.MT Bann Coy Tues 6:30 $2526112146324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Kristen Coy
published 4
3.76
Molly Shapiro
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.75
Sheila Bondoc
published 4
Dani Zepeda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Sophia Koliatsis
published 4
3.71
Monique Melnick
published 4
3.70
Priscilla Ewaldz
published 4
3.63
Susan Kalina
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.56
Lisa Potash
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.55
Narissa Breger
published 4
3.51
Jennifer Margolis
published
3.46
Linda Meyer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.33
Julie Schwan
published 3.5
3.31
Viktorya Sokol
published 3.5
3.29
Rosemary Wheeler
published 3.5
Kristine Blaser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Kalina + Sophia Koliatsis4264% games+6.2% vs expected
Narissa Breger + Dani Zepeda11854% games+5.8% vs expected
Priscilla Ewaldz + Sheila Bondoc4354% games+5.6% vs expected
Kristen Coy + Dani Zepeda321956% games+3.8% vs expected
Narissa Breger + Viktorya Sokol12754% games+2.2% vs expected
Narissa Breger + Lisa Potash7451% games−0.4% vs expected
Kristen Coy + Sophia Koliatsis4456% games−3.0% vs expected
Lisa Potash + Rosemary Wheeler4648% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Coy
127W–62L career · no lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
Molly Shapiro
58W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Sheila Bondoc
117W–62L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Dani Zepeda
69W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Sophia Koliatsis
341W–195L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Monique Melnick
93W–91L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Priscilla Ewaldz
145W–184L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Susan Kalina
52W–41L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.63
Lisa Potash
67W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Narissa Breger
162W–99L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jennifer Margolis
31W–31L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Linda Meyer
130W–84L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Julie Schwan
134W–69L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Viktorya Sokol
88W–72L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Rosemary Wheeler
162W–147L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
Kristine Blaser
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.