Teams

LCRI-Richards/CSD

2025 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-27vs LAMO-Morris/NMPSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Berry / Angela Stallman vs Toni Laney / Irma Laney3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJackie Gaine vs Diana West6-3, 6-2
2025-05-24vs LLHE-Hession/Jetton Lake LadiesWon 20
W#2 DoublesJackie Gaine / Angela Stallman vs Shaun Simmer / Kelly Hallman6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Janna Huggins vs Anna Gay / Diane Dreffer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-09vs LAMO-Morris/NMPWon 31
L#1 DoublesChristine Richards / Morgan Little vs Toni Laney / Irma Laney5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / CJ Rummelsburg vs Salem Kirven / Brittany Simpson6-3
W#2 SinglesJackie Gaine vs Hannah Chillag6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKim Ezzo / Janna Huggins vs Meghan Bartholomew / Amanda Patrocino5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-03vs LLHE-Hession/Jetton Lake LadiesLost 12
W#1 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Amanda Berry vs Felicia Dean / Anna Gay6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJackie Gaine vs Claudia Bareis3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngela Stallman / CJ Rummelsburg vs Dana Goodrich / Stefanie Flippin6-7, 3-6
2025-04-05vs LLHE-Hession/Jetton Lake LadiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesLori Woods / Maggie Lawrence vs Stefanie Flippin / Kelly Hallman6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJackie Gaine vs Allison Stearns6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKim Ezzo / Janna Huggins vs Susan Davis / Felicia Dean2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-03-29vs LAMO-Morris/NMPSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMorgan Little / Christine Richards vs Irma Laney / Toni Laney2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJamie Krueger / Janna Huggins vs Lina Clarke / Diana West3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJackie Gaine vs Rachel Morrison6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / CJ Rummelsburg vs Andreina Morris / Fumiyo Ono6-1, 7-5
2025-03-18vs LLHE-Hession/Jetton Lake LadiesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Gaine / Alexis Kaiser vs Maria Emilia de la Orden / Lauren Hession4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMaggie Lawrence vs Claudia Bareis3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKim Ezzo / Janna Huggins vs Dana Goodrich / Susan Davis4-6, 2-6
2025-03-08vs LAMO-Morris/NMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Lawrence / Christine Richards vs Irma Laney / Toni Laney2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAngela Stallman vs Rachel Morrison5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKim Ezzo / Janna Huggins vs Kate Meiners / Diana West6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Maggie Lawrence
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.33
Jessica Mauney
published
4.31
Kim Ezzo
published
4.30
Jackie Gaine
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
4.26
Lori Woods
published
CJ Rummelsburg
published 4.5
4.25
Jenna McGary
published
4.09
Christine Richards
published 4.5
4.07
Amanda Berry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Jamie Krueger
published
3.98
Alexis Kaiser
published 4
3.94
Morgan Little
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Janna Huggins
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.76
Angela Stallman
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Ezzo + Maggie Lawrence11165% games+14.0% vs expected
Maggie Lawrence + Janna Huggins101247% games−2.6% vs expected
Angela Stallman + Jackie Gaine8365% gamesnot enough data
Angela Stallman + Janna Huggins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maggie Lawrence
153W–102L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.44
Jessica Mauney
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.33
Kim Ezzo
18W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Jackie Gaine
91W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
Lori Woods
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
CJ Rummelsburg
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenna McGary
23W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Christine Richards
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Amanda Berry
156W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Jamie Krueger
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Alexis Kaiser
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Morgan Little
15W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Janna Huggins
63W–61L career · 11 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Angela Stallman
93W–48L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.