Teams

LLHE-Hession/Jetton Lake Ladies

2025 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 4.5

13 players · average NTRP 4.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-24vs LCRI-Richards/CSDLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Goodrich / Kimberly Drag vs Christine Richards / Jessica Mauney3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShaun Simmer / Kelly Hallman vs Jackie Gaine / Angela Stallman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Gay / Diane Dreffer vs Maggie Lawrence / Janna Huggins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-10vs LAMO-Morris/NMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesFelicia Dean / Dana Goodrich vs Irma Laney / Toni Laney2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Davis / Anna Gay vs Meghan Bartholomew / Amanda Patrocino3-6, 1-6
2025-05-03vs LCRI-Richards/CSDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFelicia Dean / Anna Gay vs Maggie Lawrence / Amanda Berry2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDana Goodrich / Stefanie Flippin vs Angela Stallman / CJ Rummelsburg7-6, 6-3
2025-04-14vs LAMO-Morris/NMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesFelicia Dean / Anna Gay vs Salem Kirven / Amanda Patrocino6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Drag / Michelle Fontana vs Irma Laney / Toni Laney2-6, 1-6
2025-04-05vs LCRI-Richards/CSDLost 01
L#1 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Kelly Hallman vs Lori Little / Maggie Lawrence1-6, 3-6
2025-03-22vs LAMO-Morris/NMPLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Hallman / Shaun Simmer vs Irma Laney / Toni Laney5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Davis / Dana Goodrich vs Lina Clarke / Kate Meiners6-2, 1-0
2025-03-18vs LCRI-Richards/CSDSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnna Gay / Felicia Dean vs Christine Richards / Jenna McGary0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDana Goodrich / Susan Davis vs Kim Ezzo / Janna Huggins6-4, 6-2
2025-03-06vs LAMO-Morris/NMPSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Kelly Hallman vs Lina Clarke / Diana West4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Gay / Shaun Simmer vs Kristen Oliver / Andreina Morris6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Dana Goodrich
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.29
Anna Gay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
4.25
Felicia Dean
published 4.5
3.92
Kelly Hallman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.79
Allison Stearns
published 4
3.78
Mollie Lynch
published
3.77
Michelle Fontana
published
3.75
Stefanie Flippin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Lauren Hession
published
3.67
Kimberly Drag
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Claudia Bareis
published
Shaun Simmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Fontana + Kelly Hallman5068% games+11.0% vs expected
Kimberly Drag + Dana Goodrich14357% games+2.8% vs expected
Stefanie Flippin + Kelly Hallman181056% games+0.9% vs expected
Dana Goodrich + Anna Gay4159% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Fontana + Anna Gay404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Goodrich
91W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.33
4.5
Anna Gay
42W–52L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
4.29
Maria Emilia de la Orden
36W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Felicia Dean
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Kelly Hallman
126W–65L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Allison Stearns
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
Mollie Lynch
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Michelle Fontana
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Stefanie Flippin
164W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Lauren Hession
11W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Kimberly Drag
83W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
Claudia Bareis
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shaun Simmer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.