Teams

SOLANO TA/CENTENNIAL PRK CW6.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 6.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-10-29vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesRobyn Sickler / Chamane Ifland vs Sue Taylor / Patricia Tyler7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-27vs NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS CW6.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesChamane Ifland / Robyn Sickler vs Janet Phelps / BJ Thrailkill6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Chamane Ifland
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.36
Monica Ravanello
published
3.35
Kay Johnson
published
3.30
Gloria Spencer
published
3.30
Christeta Gonzalez
published 3.5
3.22
Swaran Williams
published
3.15
Michelle Onadiaz
published
3.04
Danielle Willis
published 3.5
2.97
Cynthia Oanes
published 3.5
2.86
2.84
Josephine Rosman
published
Bobbi Jacoby
published 3
Carmen Dwyer
published 3
Leanne Outlaw Rahn
published
Leslee Fowler
published
Lisbeth Conner
published
Mary Burklow
published
Robyn Sickler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Swaran Williams + Kay Johnson4348% games−10.6% vs expected
Gloria Spencer + Monica Ravanello123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chamane Ifland
107W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
Monica Ravanello
26W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
Kay Johnson
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Gloria Spencer
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Christeta Gonzalez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Swaran Williams
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Michelle Onadiaz
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Danielle Willis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
3.5
Cynthia Oanes
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Andrea Li Fen Hsu
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.86
Josephine Rosman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Bobbi Jacoby
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Carmen Dwyer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leanne Outlaw Rahn
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslee Fowler
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisbeth Conner
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Burklow
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robyn Sickler
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.