Teams

Penn/LF

2023 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 3.0 WOMEN

17 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-20vs Netherland/LFWon 32
W#1 DoublesJody Fitzgerald / Amie Berenger vs Andie Netherland / Miranda Moore6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHolly Upthegrove vs Harrison Elle Yarnell6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChelsea Penn / Kasey Miller vs Shayle Finch / Cassidy Nelson5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTamara Sloan vs Erin Capps6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesElaina Osteen / Kristine Taylor vs Carmen Hill / Christy Stewart7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-13vs Teague/LFWon 41
W#1 DoublesKelly Bradley / Abby Kurin vs Casey Chonka / Jennifer Nicole McCants6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Upthegrove vs Rachel Hall4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHana Clancy / Jody Fitzgerald vs Sandy Greuel / Stacy Teague6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTamara Sloan vs Cammi Hyde7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMelissa Bean / Sheena Rivers vs Kristina Denney / Jamie Calkins6-2, 6-2
2023-06-07vs Elmore/RH91Won 50
W#1 DoublesHana Clancy / Jody Fitzgerald vs Sandy Hightower / Iqra Masood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHolly Upthegrove vs Erica Duncan6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesElaina Osteen / Lindsay Bennett vs Cynthia Elias / Joan Gausvik6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTamara Sloan vs Jo Flory6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristine Taylor / Melissa Bean vs Natalia Bolkvadze / DAWN Elmore6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-01vs McGinty-Dickason/PHWon 32
W#1 DoublesAbby Kurin / Kelly Bradley vs Chelsea Richardson / Jessica Rice6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKendra Blevins vs Michelle Dickason2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAmie Berenger / Hana Clancy vs Valerie Cooper / Ginger Penn6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesSheena Rivers vs Kim McGinty2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElaina Osteen / Elizabeth Woodson vs April Thompson / Marilynda Kuehn7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-18vs ORANGE 2: Aman/LFLost 13
L#1 DoublesLindsay Bennett / Amie Berenger vs Sarah Haddock / Shelley Sheppard1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKasey Miller / Amanda Shank vs Annie Richardson / Suzanne Laravea6-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesHana Clancy vs Sarah Darby7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Bean / Kristine Taylor vs Jennifer Blackshare / Kathryn Bacon2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-11vs OK/Mitchell/18 & over 3.0 WomenLost 04
L#1 DoublesJody Fitzgerald / Abby Kurin vs Lori Hubbard / Shirley Miley2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Bennett / Elaina Osteen vs Mandy Pittman / Taylor Toliver0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKendra Blevins vs Haven Willis4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Bean / Kristine Taylor vs Adria Sanditen / Melissa James4-6, 2-6
2023-05-02vs Watling/SHSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJody Fitzgerald / Amie Berenger vs Ellen Briggs / Michelle Evans3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesTamara Sloan vs Sharon Griffin2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAbby Kurin / Kelly Bradley vs Bailey Bird / Barbara Bardsley6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Shank / Kasey Miller vs Emily Moreau / Whitney Bingham6-3, 6-3
2023-04-24vs Gorospe/CRLost 23
L#1 DoublesAbby Kurin / Kelly Bradley vs Laura Vidal / Stacy Replogle4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesHolly Upthegrove vs Megan Novak4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmie Berenger / Sheena Rivers vs Mia Perkins / Megan McKinney6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKendra Blevins vs Allison Carr4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElaina Osteen / Elizabeth Woodson vs Kendall Ellsworth / Courtney Duffy6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Mitchell/18 & over 3.0 Women8035513211
2GREEN 1: Doyle/IS71301025273
3Ashman/LF71291126279
4ORANGE 2: Aman/LF71261434331
5Boedeker/TTC62231736311
6McGinty-Dickason/PH53261436310
7Penn/LF53211944369
8Zoellner/PH45222352402
9Roberts/LF34211433295
10Naughton/LF35152553390
11Elmore/RH9126103064426
12Jones/RH9117162451373
13Netherland/LF1793165419
14Peterson/LF0114958
15Kim Hendrix/LF0743165406

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Holly Upthegrove
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.90
Kelly Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.82
Abby Kurin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.79
Jody Fitzgerald
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Elizabeth Woodson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Tamara Sloan
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.59
Amie Berenger
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.50
Sheena Rivers
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Amanda Shank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Chelsea Penn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Kristine Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.07
Elaina Osteen
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Hana Clancy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Kasey Miller
published
Kendra Blevins
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Bean
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Piper Rinehart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amie Berenger + Hana Clancy7168% games+15.0% vs expected
Amie Berenger + Sheena Rivers5165% games+11.4% vs expected
Elaina Osteen + Chelsea Penn6354% games+10.4% vs expected
Amie Berenger + Jody Fitzgerald3252% games−2.4% vs expected
Abby Kurin + Kelly Bradley91147% games−4.5% vs expected
Elaina Osteen + Kristine Taylor3940% games−5.5% vs expected
Melissa Bean + Kristine Taylor4155% gamesnot enough data
Elaina Osteen + Melissa Bean224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Upthegrove
68W–58L career · 4 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Kelly Bradley
28W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
Abby Kurin
53W–43L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Jody Fitzgerald
97W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.79
Elizabeth Woodson
26W–25L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Tamara Sloan
29W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Amie Berenger
89W–59L career · 8 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
2.59
Sheena Rivers
37W–47L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%50%50%
2.50
2.5
Amanda Shank
3W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Chelsea Penn
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristine Taylor
49W–72L career · 12 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Elaina Osteen
30W–46L career · 12 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Hana Clancy
46W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kasey Miller
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kendra Blevins
21W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Bean
11W–19L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Piper Rinehart
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.