Teams

McGinty-Dickason/PH

2023 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 3.0 WOMEN

16 players · average NTRP 2.88 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-20vs Teague/LFWon 41
W#1 DoublesRhonda Hoffman / Valerie Cooper vs Karina Johannes / Rachel Hall6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Dickason vs Casey Chonka6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGinger Ford / Greta Warta vs Amy Slade / Caroline Kelly0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKim McGinty vs Kristina Denney6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarilynda Kuehn / April Thompson vs Vanessa Negley / Cammi Hyde6-2, 6-2
2023-06-13vs Elmore/RH91Won 41
L#1 DoublesGinger Coffey / Valerie Cooper vs Sandy Hightower / Cathy Gunther6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Dickason vs Natalia Bolkvadze6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCathy Williams / Jill Gulick vs Iqra Masood / Sarah Washatka3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCaroline Coffey vs Katherine Crockett6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGreta Warta / Martha Endsley vs Nancy Cooper / DAWN Elmore6-0, 6-0
2023-06-08vs OK/Mitchell/18 & over 3.0 WomenLost 23
W#1 DoublesKim McGinty / Michelle Dickason vs Jennifer Baines / Lori Hubbard6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesChelsea Richardson vs Jennifer Doud7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRhonda Hoffman / Ginger Penn vs Mandy Pittman / Chelsea Mitchell3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesJessica Rice vs Vicki Sue Loehrs2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Gulick / Ginger Coffey vs Taylor Toliver / Sthephanie Mab4-6, 0-6
2023-06-01vs Penn/LFLost 23
L#1 DoublesChelsea Richardson / Jessica Rice vs Abby Kurin / Kelly Bradley3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Dickason vs Kendra Blevins6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesValerie Cooper / Ginger Penn vs Amie Berenger / Hana Clancy4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesKim McGinty vs Sheena Rivers6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesApril Thompson / Marilynda Kuehn vs Elaina Osteen / Elizabeth Woodson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-22vs ORANGE 2: Aman/LFLost 23
L#1 DoublesJill Gulick / Cathy Williams vs Shelley Sheppard / Sarah Haddock1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKim McGinty vs Sarah Darby6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGinger Ford / Marilynda Kuehn vs Brandi Phillips / Amber Reynolds2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGinger Penn vs Mary Nesser5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCaroline Coffey / Greta Warta vs Laura Keep / Christina Richey2-6, 4-6
2023-05-11vs Watling/SHWon 32
L#1 DoublesRhonda Hoffman / Jill Gulick vs Chloe Reed / Morgan Murry1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Dickason vs Ellen Briggs6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarilynda Kuehn / Cathy Williams vs Sharon Griffin / Elizabeth Black6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKim McGinty vs Brooke Sturdivant6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGinger Ford / Ginger Coffey vs Whitney Bingham / Emily Moreau6-1, 6-1
2023-05-01vs Gorospe/CRWon 41
W#1 DoublesGinger Coffey / Valerie Cooper vs Bethany Good / Christie Crawley6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Dickason vs Kara Howard6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRhonda Hoffman / Ginger Penn vs Liberty Gorospe / Hayli Leavitt6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesApril Thompson vs Jessica Zimmerman4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCaroline Coffey / Martha Endsley vs Kendall Ellsworth / Courtney Duffy6-2, 6-2
2023-04-24vs Netherland/LFWon 50
W#1 DoublesMarilynda Kuehn / April Thompson vs Shayle Finch / Laura Gavula6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGinger Penn vs Miranda Moore6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCathy Williams / Rhonda Hoffman vs Christy Stewart / Carmen Hill6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKim McGinty vs Harrison Elle Yarnell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGinger Ford / Caroline Coffey vs Andie Netherland / Courtney Pearce6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Mitchell/18 & over 3.0 Women8035513211
2GREEN 1: Doyle/IS71301025273
3Ashman/LF71291126279
4ORANGE 2: Aman/LF71261434331
5Boedeker/TTC62231736311
6McGinty-Dickason/PH53261436310
7Penn/LF53211944369
8Zoellner/PH45222352402
9Roberts/LF34211433295
10Naughton/LF35152553390
11Elmore/RH9126103064426
12Jones/RH9117162451373
13Netherland/LF1793165419
14Peterson/LF0114958
15Kim Hendrix/LF0743165406

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Michelle Dickason
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Kim McGinty
usually #2 Singles 42%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.96
Ginger Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.95
Jill Gulick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Valerie Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
April Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Cathy Williams
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Chelsea Richardson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Ginger Penn
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Rhonda Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.55
Martha Endsley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Marilynda Kuehn
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Caroline Coffey
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Ginger Ford
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Greta Warta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jessica Rice
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Cooper + Kim McGinty5166% games+13.4% vs expected
Valerie Cooper + Ginger Coffey8162% games+9.4% vs expected
Valerie Cooper + Ginger Penn8459% games+8.3% vs expected
Rhonda Hoffman + Valerie Cooper7154% games+7.9% vs expected
Ginger Coffey + Ginger Penn4255% games+7.8% vs expected
Ginger Penn + Kim McGinty3442% games+7.2% vs expected
Kim McGinty + Michelle Dickason251358% games+6.4% vs expected
Rhonda Hoffman + Ginger Penn5550% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Dickason
154W–76L career · 11 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
Kim McGinty
100W–73L career · 12 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Ginger Coffey
106W–69L career · 8 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Jill Gulick
108W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Valerie Cooper
89W–57L career · 8 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
April Thompson
31W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cathy Williams
44W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Chelsea Richardson
52W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ginger Penn
133W–105L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
2.75
Rhonda Hoffman
117W–113L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%17%83%
2.63
Martha Endsley
67W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55
Marilynda Kuehn
48W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Caroline Coffey
6W–5L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ginger Ford
69W–63L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Greta Warta
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Rice
34W–21L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.