Teams

Kim Hendrix/LF

2023 TUL ADULT 18 & Over League · 3.0 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-25vs Ashman/LFLost 05
L#1 DoublesKimberley Hendrix / Karen Santee vs Sarah McPhail / Haley Ragsdale2-6
L#1 SinglesLaQuisha Epps vs Kelly Stalb0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Davison / Susan Page vs Jennifer Auer / Karlie Free2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesStephanie McCaskill vs Julie Chadwick2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Hendrix / Mckayla Hendrix vs Allison Ashman / Whitney Largent4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-16vs Thompson/LFLost 14
L#1 DoublesKaren Santee / Kimberley Hendrix vs Alexis Hubble / Tracie Pelotte4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesStephanie Jackson vs Jacqlyn Hurst2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Page / Stephanie McCaskill vs Sharon Guterman / Michelle Torres2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMckayla Hendrix vs Meagan Jacobs-Irwin1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmber Hendrix / LaQuisha Epps vs Kimberly Hurd / Candice Randolph6-0, 6-2
2023-06-13vs Zoellner/PHLost 04
L#1 DoublesKimberley Hendrix / Karen Santee vs Malisa Nell / Lisa Charvat2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMckayla Hendrix vs Christina Mamalis3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSusan Page / Marla Cole vs Dena Dye / Diane Paxson3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Davison / Georgette Morris vs Michelle Daniels / Darla Knight4-6, 4-6
2023-06-01vs Naughton/LFLost 13
L#1 SinglesKaren Santee vs Anita Wyatt3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLaQuisha Epps / Susan Page vs Beth Anne Manipella / Leslie Naughton5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesGeorgette Morris vs Rebecca Lewis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarla Cole / Amber Hendrix vs Cathy Burdick / Laurie Swarer4-6, 5-7
2023-05-22vs Peterson/LFLost 03
L#1 DoublesReagan Reininger / Karen Santee vs Jennifer Poole / Tammy Preaus1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBeverly Davison / LaQuisha Epps vs Val Hansen / Tricia Riggs3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmber Hendrix / Marla Cole vs Edwina McKee / Karen Forbes4-6, 2-6
2023-05-18vs Jones/RH91Lost 05
L#1 DoublesKimberley Hendrix / Karen Santee vs Monica Auschwitz / Carly Bush6-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMckayla Hendrix vs Mindy Jones2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGeorgette Morris / Stephanie Jackson vs Molly Barker / Krystal Williams0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBeverly Davison vs Kelly West4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarla Cole / Amber Hendrix vs Anna Quick / Jessica Ullrich4-6, 3-6
2023-05-11vs Roberts/LFWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaren Santee vs Melissa Nail6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Page / LaQuisha Epps vs Kristin Yannaccone / Kathy Roberts6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCameron Coley / Georgette Morris vs Brandy Roulet / Rebecca Carrasco7-5, 7-6
2023-05-08vs Boedeker/TTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Page / Stephanie McCaskill vs Colleen Mordhorst / Meg Grewal2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMckayla Hendrix / Reagan Reininger vs Karen Freudenrich / Jan Girouard6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeverly Davison / LaQuisha Epps vs Ashleigh Boedeker / Farrell Seay6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-01vs GREEN 1: Doyle/ISLost 04
L#1 DoublesKaren Santee / Cameron Coley vs Jenni Hutchins / Carrie OHara0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesWhitney Stauffer vs Eleanor Doyle2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMckayla Hendrix vs Barb Evans2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaQuisha Epps / Stephanie Jackson vs Sheila Cooper / Kerry Fesperman1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 3.0 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Mitchell/18 & over 3.0 Women8035513211
2GREEN 1: Doyle/IS71301025273
3Ashman/LF71291126279
4ORANGE 2: Aman/LF71261434331
5Boedeker/TTC62231736311
6McGinty-Dickason/PH53261436310
7Penn/LF53211944369
8Zoellner/PH45222352402
9Roberts/LF34211433295
10Naughton/LF35152553390
11Elmore/RH9126103064426
12Jones/RH9117162451373
13Netherland/LF1793165419
14Peterson/LF0114958
15Kim Hendrix/LF0743165406

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Amber Hendrix
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Georgette Morris
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.63
LaQuisha Epps
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
2.61
Beverly Davison
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.48
Karen Santee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.40
Marla Cole
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
2.35
Stephanie McCaskill
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.31
Whitney Stauffer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.27
Susan Page
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.18
Stephanie Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
2.17
Kimberley Hendrix
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
Cameron Coley
published
Mckayla Hendrix
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Reagan Reininger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LaQuisha Epps + Beverly Davison5455% games+11.6% vs expected
Georgette Morris + LaQuisha Epps15265% games+10.5% vs expected
LaQuisha Epps + Stephanie McCaskill7352% games+4.1% vs expected
Marla Cole + Amber Hendrix1446% games+3.7% vs expected
Susan Page + Karen Santee1441% games+3.1% vs expected
Kimberley Hendrix + Karen Santee73238% games−0.2% vs expected
Kimberley Hendrix + Marla Cole3641% games−0.3% vs expected
Marla Cole + Karen Santee1532% games−1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amber Hendrix
65W–50L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
Georgette Morris
60W–24L career · 8 lines in 2023
0%9%91%
2.69
LaQuisha Epps
46W–41L career · 14 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Beverly Davison
37W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
Karen Santee
26W–76L career · 8 lines in 2023
0%55%45%
2.48
Marla Cole
31W–76L career · 14 lines in 2023
0%77%23%
2.40
Stephanie McCaskill
27W–36L career · 11 lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
Whitney Stauffer
13W–41L career · 1 line in 2023
0%92%8%
2.31
Susan Page
13W–57L career · 6 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
2.27
Stephanie Jackson
14W–44L career · 9 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Kimberley Hendrix
26W–82L career · 8 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.17
Cameron Coley
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mckayla Hendrix
4W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Reagan Reininger
15W–22L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.