Teams

SPANISH TRAIL #2

2021 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 18 & OVER · 2.5 WOMEN - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.67 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-02vs CLUB RIDGESLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Chang / Nancy Ozun vs Golssa Moridi / Maryam Kaveh6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Courtney Long2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTaylor Larson / Nancy Myster vs Vinne Chen / Abby Zhu2-6, 0-6
2021-05-26vs DTC #5Won 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Ozun / Michelle Strahler vs Lani Wong / Christy Cropper3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTaylor Larson vs Vivian McCarthy6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Myster / Catherine Fadrowsky vs Christa Shiklanian / Melissa Orozco6-2, 6-4
2021-05-19vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Myster / Taylor Larson vs Rachel Lamb / Christy Moxley3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Rachael Sigsbee0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Ozun / Alexandria Chang vs Nicole Austin / Jen White6-2, 7-6
2021-05-12vs DTC #1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Ozun / Nancy Myster vs Kellie Woods / Alex Pinson2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Megan Bell1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlexandria Chang / Taylor Larson vs Kristina Runion / Beth Spreitzer2-6, 0-6
2021-05-05vs ANTHEM CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Chang / Nancy Myster vs Sandra Shearer / Katie Gerber0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTaylor Larson vs Sarah Kim1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Ozun / Catherine Fadrowsky vs Brooke Rice / Destiny McDoniel5-7, 2-6
2021-04-28vs CANYON GATE #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Ozun / Nancy Myster vs Nadine Kluger / Jill Morrison0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Natasha Kattau0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAlexandria Chang / Taylor Larson vs Christy Shulman / Rita Spurgin6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-04-21vs DTC #3Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Chang / Nancy Ozun vs Joan Chinn / Maria Zoine6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Myster / Taylor Larson vs Ashlin Nelson / Jessica Zoine4-6, 4-6
2021-04-14vs CLUB RIDGESWon 21
W#1 DoublesCatherine Fadrowsky / Nancy Ozun vs Courtney Long / Tiffani Kastrati6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTiffany Rorman vs Vinne Chen1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Strahler / Nancy Myster vs Golssa Moridi / Maryam Kaveh6-3, 7-5
2021-04-07vs DTC #5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Chang / Catherine Fadrowsky vs Janelle Wright / Diana Stiglic4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Strahler vs Christy Cropper4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTaylor Larson / Tiffany Rorman vs Lani Wong / Melissa Orozco6-3, 6-3
2021-03-24vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesAlexandria Chang / Nancy Ozun vs Christy Moxley / Shaza Nayef6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTaylor Larson vs Jana Vogel1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Fadrowsky / Nancy Myster vs Allison Raub / Jessica Baran2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 WOMEN - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Alexandria Chang
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.56
Catherine Fadrowsky
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.56
Nancy Ozun
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.34
Tiffany Rorman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Michelle Strahler
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 2.5
1.98
Nancy Myster
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 2.5
Taylor Larson
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Ozun + Catherine Fadrowsky6256% games+9.5% vs expected
Alexandria Chang + Catherine Fadrowsky3356% games+3.2% vs expected
Nancy Ozun + Alexandria Chang161054% games+0.5% vs expected
Michelle Strahler + Tiffany Rorman2536% games−4.5% vs expected
Nancy Myster + Nancy Ozun61440% games−7.0% vs expected
Nancy Myster + Catherine Fadrowsky6262% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Strahler + Nancy Ozun134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Myster + Taylor Larson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexandria Chang
118W–90L career · 8 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
2.5
Catherine Fadrowsky
32W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%32%68%
2.56
3
Nancy Ozun
109W–137L career · type A · 12 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Tiffany Rorman
39W–76L career · 2 lines in 2021
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Michelle Strahler
23W–110L career · 13 lines in 2021
not enough data
2.5
Nancy Myster
44W–41L career · 9 lines in 2021
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Taylor Larson
29W–28L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.