Teams

Hard Hitters

2024 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

18 players · average NTRP 3.73 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-09-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesWill Zimmerman / Suzanna Murali vs Shawna Byington / Andy Mehl6-2, 6-3
2024-09-18vs Tap Dat AceLost 03
L#1 DoublesWill Zimmerman / Caitlin Zimmerman vs Scott Anders / Kiley Holt4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerry Hardy / Greg Haskell vs Robyn Roby / Steven Garcia4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNicole Hancock / William Jacobs vs Jason Jones / Linda Western5-7, 4-6
2024-09-11vs Mister and Miss HitsWon 10
W#3 DoublesWill Zimmerman / Caitlin Zimmerman vs Sandra Gulley / Veeresh Math6-4, 6-4
2024-09-04vs Loose StringsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanna Murali / Greg Haskell vs Suzanne Malmstrom / Ray Cochrane6-0, 6-4
2024-08-28vs Between the LinesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Parsons / William Jacobs vs Steve Hoffman / Jennifer Bell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-08-26vs UP YOUR ALLYLost 01
L#2 DoublesKristen Jacobs / Greg Haskell vs Jacqueline Hickman / Luke Felt3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-08-21vs WTF-2024Lost 02
L#2 DoublesWill Zimmerman / Caitlin Zimmerman vs Karl Baughman / Zel Mertz5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanna Murali / Greg Haskell vs Lisa Trujillo-Dunn / James Hart6-7, 4-6
2024-08-19vs MSA 7.5 (Mas Serve Aces)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Jacobs / William Jacobs vs Blake Ediss / Karri Jones6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-12vs TenniscityWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Jacobs / Greg Haskell vs Terri Wippel / Brahma Reddy Yenumula6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesWill Zimmerman / Caitlin Zimmerman vs Carter Anderson / Brette Shakespeare6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tenniscity10228823268
2Tap Dat Ace10227927311
3Domin-Asians93221434303
4WTF-202484251129276
5UP YOUR ALLY84201637309
6Hard Hitters75181841327
7NTF3S66181841324
8Mix-n-Match66201642362
9Loose Strings57171944312
10Hillcrest 7.548162042328
11Mister and Miss Hits39112556387
12MSA 7.5 (Mas Serve Aces)210122451358
13ETC Mixers#000000
14Between the Lines01203672431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Kristen Jacobs
published 4
3.96
Robert Miranda
published 4
3.85
Suzanna Murali
published 4
3.78
Nicole Hancock
published 4
3.74
Mary Parsons
published 4
3.73
3.63
Jacob Sessions
published 4
3.45
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.43
Terry Hardy
published 4
3.27
Jon Hancock
published 3.5
Bill Johnson
published 3.5
3.24
Lee Parsons
published 3
3.22
Katherine Johnson
published 3.5
3.21
Hallie Barnes
published 3.5
3.19
William Merrick
published 3.5
Greg Haskell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Will Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
William Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Sessions + Dawn Crochet9649% games+11.3% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Jacob Sessions13262% games+1.7% vs expected
Suzanna Murali + Robert Miranda17858% games+1.5% vs expected
Robert Miranda + Hallie Barnes231755% games+0.6% vs expected
Jon Hancock + Nicole Hancock182150% games−7.0% vs expected
Mary Parsons + Lee Parsons192250% games−7.0% vs expected
Kristen Jacobs + William Jacobs14656% gamesnot enough data
Will Zimmerman + Caitlin Zimmerman41645% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Jacobs
208W–89L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Robert Miranda
239W–111L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Suzanna Murali
296W–164L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Nicole Hancock
137W–105L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Mary Parsons
169W–125L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Caitlin Zimmerman
113W–57L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Jacob Sessions
107W–72L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Dawn Crochet
163W–176L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
4
Terry Hardy
157W–231L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
3.43
3.5
Jon Hancock
55W–65L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Bill Johnson
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Lee Parsons
62W–75L career · no lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.24
3.5
Katherine Johnson
128W–141L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Hallie Barnes
63W–54L career · type A · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
William Merrick
72W–56L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Greg Haskell
20W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Will Zimmerman
14W–28L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Jacobs
14W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.