Teams

MSA 7.5 (Mas Serve Aces)

2024 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

21 players · average NTRP 3.73 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-23vs Mix-n-MatchLost 01
L#2 DoublesBryan Dingel / Sophia Haroian vs Sonia Ivanova / Jordan Kerpa6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-18vs NTF3SWon 10
W#2 DoublesSophia Haroian / John Rosellini vs Jeffrey Raulston / Shawna Byington6-3, 7-5
2024-09-16vs Tap Dat AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesGlory Questad / Dave Agler vs John Chavez / Erin Perry6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-09vs Mister and Miss HitsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStella Emerson / Andy Emerson vs Daniela Hefner / Veeresh Math2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDouglas Salerno / Amy Salerno vs Danielle Lofgren / Dave Gopalakrishnan6-3, 7-5
2024-09-06vs TenniscityLost 01
L#3 DoublesGlory Questad / Blake Ediss vs Ryan Cook / Terri Wippel4-6, 4-6
2024-09-04vs ETC MixersWon 10
W#1 DoublesGlory Questad / Shane Vaughan vs Mary Adcox / Ron Saunders1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-08-19vs Hard HittersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDave Agler / Glory Questad vs Jacob Sessions / Dawn Crochet2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAndy Emerson / Stella Emerson vs Lee Parsons / Mary Parsons6-0, 7-6
2024-08-12vs Hillcrest 7.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesGlory Questad / Shane Vaughan vs Maria Heffner / Veeresh Gowdru Ramesh5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesStella Emerson / Andy Emerson vs Jesica Mitchell / Jamie Dudley5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tenniscity10228823268
2Tap Dat Ace10227927311
3Domin-Asians93221434303
4WTF-202484251129276
5UP YOUR ALLY84201637309
6Hard Hitters75181841327
7NTF3S66181841324
8Mix-n-Match66201642362
9Loose Strings57171944312
10Hillcrest 7.548162042328
11Mister and Miss Hits39112556387
12MSA 7.5 (Mas Serve Aces)210122451358
13ETC Mixers#000000
14Between the Lines01203672431

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Sophia Haroian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Blake Ediss
published 3.5
3.73
Shane Vaughan
published 4
3.73
Karri Jones
published 4
3.69
Jeffrey Pugsley
published 4
3.69
Dave Agler
published 4
3.67
Tanya Vaughan
published 4
3.56
Bryan Dingel
published 4
3.52
3.40
John Rosellini
published 3.5
3.38
Brad Daines
published 3.5
3.35
Douglas Salerno
published 3.5
3.30
Jared Stein
published
3.24
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
3.20
Andy Emerson
published 3.5
3.14
Cindy Biedebach
published 3.5
2.95
Amy Salerno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Jennifer Wilson
published
Glory Questad
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Kristie Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Stella Emerson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Wilson + Jared Stein251953% games+4.3% vs expected
Tanya Vaughan + Shane Vaughan302650% games+3.0% vs expected
Sondra Power-Thornton + John Rosellini3453% games+2.1% vs expected
Douglas Salerno + Amy Salerno101450% games−11.2% vs expected
Stella Emerson + Andy Emerson101051% gamesnot enough data
Shane Vaughan + Glory Questad6251% gamesnot enough data
Dave Agler + Glory Questad0844% gamesnot enough data
Kristie Thompson + Dave Agler2452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Haroian
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
3.5
Blake Ediss
28W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Shane Vaughan
127W–111L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Karri Jones
184W–108L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Jeffrey Pugsley
69W–56L career · type A · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Dave Agler
63W–107L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Tanya Vaughan
148W–143L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Bryan Dingel
105W–134L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Sondra Power-Thornton
108W–90L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
John Rosellini
85W–82L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Brad Daines
59W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Douglas Salerno
111W–92L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Jared Stein
80W–39L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Andy Emerson
116W–117L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cindy Biedebach
54W–66L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Amy Salerno
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Jennifer Wilson
85W–66L career · no lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.93
Glory Questad
43W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristie Thompson
36W–49L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stella Emerson
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.